Effect of controlled rolling/controlled cooling parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of the novel pipeline steel
Source abstract
Abstract
The study of controlled rolling/controlled cooling process parameters which affect the microstructure and mechanical properties of a novel pipeline steel have been optimized by the orthogonal experiment with four factors and three levels in this paper. However, the parameters of thermo-mechanical control process (TMCP) optimized by the Gleeble-3500 hot simulator could not satisfy performance requirements of the X100 pipeline steel. In order to improve the performance of this steel, the influence of finish cooling temperature (FCT) on the microstructure and property is studied in detail. It is found that, as this steel is thermo-mechanically treated by this set of parameters (the start heating temperature, finish rolling temperature (FRT), FCT and cooling rate of 1,180 °C, 810 °C, 350 °C and 35 °C/s, respectively), the microstructures are mainly composed of granular bainite (GB) and acicular ferrite (AF). The effective grain sizes are below 20 µm; the steel reached the optimal balance between the strength and the toughness; the yield strength is 695 MPa; the tensile strength is 768 MPa; the elongation is 16.6 %; the impact energy is 262 J at room temperature. All indexes could meet the requirements of X100 pipeline steel.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang YK, Pan JH, Yang K, et al (2007) In: Proceedings of international symposiumon microalloyed steels for the oil and gas industry. pp 135–179
2. Hillenbrand HG, Kalwa C (2002) Production and service behavior of high strength large diameter pipes. In: Toyoda M, Denys R eds. Proceedings of international conference on the application and evaluation of high-grade linepipes in hostile environments. Scientific Surveys Ltd., Yokohama, pp 203–215
3. Okaguchi S (2005) Production and development of linepipe steel in grade X100 and X120. In: International forum of X100/X120 high strength line pipe. Beijing, 2005
4. Haiwen L, Han D (2006) Development of X80–X120 high grade linepipe steels and their applications. J China Metall 16(4):9–15
5. Gómez M, Valles P, Medina SF (2011) Evolution of microstructure and precipitation state during thermo mechanical processing of a X80 microalloyed steel. J Mater Sci Eng A528(13–14):4761–477310.1016/j.msea.2011.02.087 ↗
6. Hillenbrand HG, Amoris E, Niederhoff KA(1995) Manufacrurability of linepipe in grads up to X100 from TM processed plate C pipeline technology conference
7. Wang G (2012) Development of a new generation TMCP technology. J Steel Rolling 29(1):1–7
8. Hitoshi A, Takuya H et al (2004) Development of ultra-high-strength linepipe X120. J Nippon Steel Tech Rep 9:82–88
9. Wang CM, Wu XF, Liu J (2006) Transmission electron microscopy of martensite/austenite islands in pipeline steel X70. J Mater Sci Eng A440:267–27110.1016/j.msea.2006.02.118 ↗
10. Huilin GA (2009) Pipeline steel alloy design and its research progress. J Welded Pipe Tube 11:5–12
11. Wang C, Lu Q (2004) Alloy design for pipeline steel. J Angang Technol 6:22–28
12. Gerry P, Michael J, Keough (2002) Experimental design and data analyses for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision, GB/T 1172 (1999) Conversion of hardness and strength for ferrous metal. Standards Press of China, Beijing
14. Liang D, Zhu Y, Zhou L et al (2011) Acicular ferrite and its heterogeneous nucleation mechanism in steels. J Heat Treat Metals 36(12):105–110
15. Kimura Y, Takaki S (1997) Phase transformation mechanism of Fe-Cu alloys. ISIJ Int 37(3):290–29510.2355/isijinternational.37.290 ↗
16. Linna L, Yu C, Liu Q et al (2014) Effect of thermo-mechanical control process on microstructure of high strength X100 pipeline steel. J Chin J Mater Res 28(1):51–57
17. Shang CJ, Wang XM (2005) Microstructure and mechanical properties of low carbon bainitic. J Steel Iron Steel 40(4):57
18. Keehyun K, Nongmoon H, Byungjoo L et al (2005) Effect of the finish rolling temperature on mechanical properties and microstructure evolution of linepipesteel. Mater Sci Forum, 475–479:89–92
19. Phillips R, Chapman JA (1966) Influence of finish rolling temperature on mechanical properties of some commercial steels rolled to 13/16 in diameter bars. J Iron Steel Institute 204:615–620
20. Fang HS, Yang ZG, Yang JB (2005) Research on bainite transformation in steels. J Acta Metall Sin 41(5):449
21. Rodrigues PCM, Pereloma EV, Santoc DB (2000) Mechanical properties of an HSLA bainitic steel subjected to controlled rolling with accelerated rolling. J Mater Sci Eng 283A(6):136–14310.1016/S0921-5093(99)00795-9 ↗
22. Wiskel JB, Ivey DG, Henein H (2008) The effects of finish rolling temperature and cooling interrupt conditions on precipitation in microalloyed steels using small angle neutron scattering. J Mater Sci Eng B 39:116
23. Jiang M, Chen L, Pang W (2012) Thermal-mechanical simulation of the controlled rolling and cooling process by orthogonal design for pipeline steel. J Adv Mater Res 3:2355–236010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.557-559.2355 ↗
24. Chen L, Jiang M, Zhou F et al (2012) Optimization and testing for controlled rolling and cooling process by orthogonal design. J Chin Soc Rare Earths 30:834–837