journal article·2022-04

Activation energy approach for alkali-activated glass inorganic binders in different aging conditions

Tai-An Chen

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 34· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, waste glass was alkali-activated by activators with different amounts of sodium hydroxide and subjected to aging. The chemical reactions and resulting microstructures and properties of the alkali-activated glass inorganic binders (AAGIBs) were affected by the aging temperature and duration. An activation energy approach was used to evaluate the effects of aging temperature and duration on the 4-day compressive strengths of the AAGIB specimens. When the amount of sodium hydroxide in the activators was low, the activation energies for the dissolution and polycondensation reactions of the AAGIBs were 83.3 kJ/mol and 44.6 kJ/mol, respectively. As the weight fraction of sodium oxide (FSO) in the activators was increased, the microstructure of the hardened binder was destroyed because of vigorous stirring during aging. Consequently, the activation energy of the AAGIB polycondensation reaction increased to 76.2 kJ/mol when FSO > 5%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Department of Harbor and River Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan ()

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.01410.1016/j.rser.2011.02.014 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.02210.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.022 ↗
3. 10.1080/14680629.2017.140848310.1080/14680629.2017.1408483 ↗
4. ASTM (2017) C1074-17: Standard practice for estimating concrete strength by the maturity method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
5. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.03110.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.031 ↗
6. 10.1080/02533839.2020.177720610.1080/02533839.2020.1777206 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.11.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.11.011 ↗
8. Christiansen MU · ACI Materials Journal · 2019 · 116 · 23910.14359/51716979 ↗
9. Davidovits J · 2008
10. Davidovits J · 1988 · 195 · 50-ENVR
11. 10.1016/0008-8846(92)90118-F10.1016/0008-8846(92)90118-F ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.02410.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.024 ↗
14. 10.1002/pol.1966.11004050410.1002/pol.1966.110040504 ↗
15. 10.1002/pol.1969.11007010910.1002/pol.1969.110070109 ↗
16. Ge DS · Fiber Glass · 2005 · 5 · 1
17. 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00563-310.1016/0022-3093(95)00563-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.21110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.211 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.025 ↗
20. Khan KA · Jurnal Teknologi · 2019 · 81 · 139
21. 10.1016/0040-6031(95)02316-T10.1016/0040-6031(95)02316-T ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.16910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.169 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.11.00710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.11.007 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1204058810.3390/ma12040588 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00727-X10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00727-X ↗
26. 10.1201/978148226690010.1201/9781482266900 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11850210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118502 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.08.03210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.08.032 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.31110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.311 ↗