journal article·2025-05-01Open access

A study on moisture management properties in knit fabrics made from cattail and cotton blends

Rajesh Kumar, Adity Saxena

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

This study explores the moisture management properties of knitted fabrics incorporating cotton and cattail fiber blends with intent to improve performance for sportswear applications. Nine different fabric samples were developed using different blend ratios of 90/10, 80/20, and 70/30 (cotton to cattail) along with three different knit structures: interlock, loop knit (fleece), and rib. The fabrics were assessed in terms of some important moisture management parameters, which are wetting time, absorption rate, maximum wetted radius, spreading speed, AOTI and OMMC. The results indicate that rib-knit fabrics always lead the pack across all spreading speed, accumulated one-way transport index (AOTI), and overall moisture management parameters; the 90:10 rib blend has the shortest wetting time (2.8 s top, 2.3 s bottom), the highest absorption rate (1.4 mm/s top, 2.3 mm/s bottom), superior spreading speed (2.0 mm/s top, 2.6 mm/s bottom) and the highest OMMC (0.90). Loop-knit fabrics have the longest wetting times (4.8 s top, 4.2 s bottom), a lower absorption rate (0.8 mm/s top, 1.5 mm/s bottom) and the lowest OMMC (0.70), which indicates that moisture transport efficiency is not optimal. The investigation reveals that an increase in cattail content leads to a reduction in the moisture absorption and transport properties. Therefore, the lowest OMMC is recorded for the 70:30 blend, that is 0.82 for rib and 0.70 for loop knit. The results have highlighted significant correlations between fabric structure, fiber composition, and moisture management efficiency, therefore showing that rib-knit fabrics with lower cattail content would be most suitable for high-performance sportswear in warm climates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Color perception and design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Arts and Design, Woxsen University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Maanvizhi M, Prakash C, Ramesh Babu V. Effects of sewing thread filament fineness on moisture management properties of seams. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2024; 49(3): 385–392.
2. Geethanjali TS, Prakash C, Ramesh Babu V, et al. Effect of bamboo/silk blending on the moisture management characteristics of the fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2024; 49(3): 325–329.
3. Shobanasree PC, Prakash C, Ramesh Kumar M. Moisture management properties of cellulose single jersey fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2023; 48(3): 287–294.
4. 10.1007/s00289-023-04889-010.1007/s00289-023-04889-0 ↗
5. 10.1177/2472344423117222010.1177/24723444231172220 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00289-023-04770-010.1007/s00289-023-04770-0 ↗
7. Vidya T, Prakash C, Rajwin AJ, et al. Effect of plasma treatment on polyester knitted fabrics part-II: moisture management properties. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2023; 48(1): 13–18.
8. 10.1080/15440478.2022.213168510.1080/15440478.2022.2131685 ↗
9. Ananthi P, Jemina Rani PC, Prakash C. Effect of blend ratio on moisture management characteristics of regenerated bamboo/lotus single jersey knitted fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2022; 47(4): 477–480.
10. 10.1520/JTE2022039110.1520/JTE20220391 ↗
11. 10.1080/15440478.2022.212592210.1080/15440478.2022.2125922 ↗
12. 10.1080/15440478.2022.208666310.1080/15440478.2022.2086663 ↗
13. 10.1080/15440478.2022.204713310.1080/15440478.2022.2047133 ↗
14. 10.22581/muet1982.2204.0710.22581/muet1982.2204.07 ↗
15. Udaya Krithika SM, Sampath MB, Prakash C, et al. Comfort properties of moisture management finished bi-layer knitted fabrics: part II – moisture management. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2022; 47(3): 175–178.
16. Udaya Krithika SM, Sampath MB, Prakash C, et al. Comfort properties of moisture management finished bi-layer knitted fabrics: part I – thermal comfort. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2022; 47(2): 175–178.
17. Vidhya M, ParveenBanu K, Vasanth Kumar D, et al. Study on single jersey knitted fabrics made from cotton/polyester core spun yarns. Part II: moisture management properties. Tekst Confeksyion 2022; 32(1): 37–46.
18. 10.1080/15440478.2019.169111110.1080/15440478.2019.1691111 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01596.x10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01596.x ↗
20. 10.54279/mijeec.v3i2.24516710.54279/mijeec.v3i2.245167 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0239481710.1007/BF02394817 ↗
22. 10.1111/rec.1285910.1111/rec.12859 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.08810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.088 ↗
24. Zhang J, Yan X, Cao S, et al. Morphological characterization and properties of cattail fibers. Mater Technol 2018; 52(5): 625–631.
25. 10.1007/s12221-021-0194-810.1007/s12221-021-0194-8 ↗
26. 10.1080/09593330.2016.118111110.1080/09593330.2016.1181111 ↗
27. 10.1080/15440478.2020.187064310.1080/15440478.2020.1870643 ↗
28. 10.1007/s13399-022-03332-010.1007/s13399-022-03332-0 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10570-019-02879-y10.1007/s10570-019-02879-y ↗
30. 10.1520/JTE2021025710.1520/JTE20210257 ↗
31. 10.1080/15440478.2021.194444310.1080/15440478.2021.1944443 ↗
32. 10.5604/01.3001.0014.608610.5604/01.3001.0014.6086 ↗
33. Sampath MB, Prakash C, Senthil Kuamr M. Influence of moisture management finish on comfort characteristics of knitted fabrics made from different yarns. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2020; 45(1): 102–108.
34. Udayakirthika SM, Sampath MB, Prakash C, et al. Moisture management finish on woven fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2019; 44(4): 486–491.
35. Prakash C, Karunakaran KC. Effect of blend ratio and single, double and plated yarn on moisture management properties of bamboo/cotton jersey knitted fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res 2019; 44(3): 294–298.
36. 10.1108/IJCST-01-2019-000210.1108/IJCST-01-2019-0002 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12221-019-8815-110.1007/s12221-019-8815-1 ↗
38. 10.5604/01.3001.0012.750510.5604/01.3001.0012.7505 ↗
39. 10.1080/15440478.2016.118770010.1080/15440478.2016.1187700 ↗
40. 10.1080/00405000.2013.80037810.1080/00405000.2013.800378 ↗