journal article·2015-06

Influence of particle size distribution on accurate X-ray quantitative analysis of tetracalcium aluminoferrite

Piqi Zhao, Peiming Wang, Xianping Liu

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 27· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The influence of particle statistics of a tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C4AF)–aluminium oxide (Al2O3) mixture on the accuracy of X-ray quantitative analysis was investigated by the reference intensity ratio (RIR) and the Rietveld method, supported by two-dimensional synchrotron diffraction image and integral one-dimensional diffraction pattern as a standard control. The quantitative results of tetracalcium aluminoferrite–aluminium oxide mixture show that both the RIR and Rietveld method can perform correctly quantitative analysis when most of the particles (>95%) have sizes in the range between 1 and 5 μm. The actual particle size distribution is between 0·7 μm and 5·1 μm. The amorphous rate of tetracalcium aluminoferrite is 2·8% during such grinding processes. The errors increase dramatically if large particles of tetracalcium aluminoferrite (>5 μm) exist, even though such particles are as low as 3·2% in numerical statistics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PhD Student, Department of Cement-based materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Professor, Department of Cement-based Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Department of Cement-based Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ac60022a00210.1021/ac60022a002 ↗
2. 10.2138/rmg.2012.74.510.2138/rmg.2012.74.5 ↗
3. 10.1080/1478644450852091810.1080/14786444508520918 ↗
4. 10.1107/S002188987401038710.1107/S0021889874010387 ↗
5. 10.1017/S088571560001349X10.1017/S088571560001349X ↗
6. 10.1107/S002188980301375X10.1107/S002188980301375X ↗
7. 10.1017/S088571560000915510.1017/S0885715600009155 ↗
8. Hammersley AP · 1998
9. 10.1017/S088571560001325710.1017/S0885715600013257 ↗
10. 10.1107/S002188987601080710.1107/S0021889876010807 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja02229a00310.1021/ja02229a003 ↗
12. 10.1017/S088571560001198210.1017/S0885715600011982 ↗
13. Klug HP · 1974
14. Larson AC · 1994
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.10.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2010.10.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.11.04110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.11.041 ↗
17. 10.1107/S002188987701268010.1107/S0021889877012680 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00332-010.1016/S0955-2219(00)00332-0 ↗
19. Rietveld HM · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 1969 · 2 · 65
20. 10.1154/1.142328510.1154/1.1423285 ↗
21. 10.1017/S088571560001868610.1017/S0885715600018686 ↗
22. Snyder RL · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · 1989 · 20 · 101
23. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00505-610.1016/S0008-8846(00)00505-6 ↗
24. 10.1524/zksu.2009.000810.1524/zksu.2009.0008 ↗
25. 10.1107/S002188988100899610.1107/S0021889881008996 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-1-4613-9535-510.1007/978-1-4613-9535-5 ↗