Use of lithium compounds to prevent expansive alkali—silica reactivity in concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
The effectiveness of Li2CO3 and LiNO3 in preventing expansive alkali–silica reactivity in concrete mixes made with two natural siliceous aggregates and different alkali contents was investigated using both the expansion test at 38°C and 100% RH and the ultra-accelerated expansion test in alkaline solutions at 150°C. LiNO3 proves to be always effective while Li2CO3 is effective only when the difference between the concrete alkali content (Lac) and the threshold alkali level of the aggregate (TAL) does not exceed 1.7 kg Na2Oeq/m3 and the concrete mixes are stored at 38°C and 100% RH. The ultra-accelerated test methods proves to be appropriate for determining the effective dosages of LiNO3 in concrete mixes made with different alkali contents. There exists a linear relationship between the effective dosage of LiNO3 in terms of Li2O/Na2Oeq molar ratio and the difference Lac-TAL, indicating a remarkable increase of Li2O/Na2Oeq with Lac.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CESI S.p.A., Milan Italy
Faculty of Engineering Via Eudossiana, 18, 00184 Roma, Italy
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. McCoy W. J. · Journal of the American Concrete Institute · 1951 · 22 · 693
2. Durand B. Contrôle des réactions alcalis-granulats par l'utilisation des ajouts minéraux. Ph.D. thesis, 1988, École Polytechnique, Montréal, Québec: 310.
3. Sakaguchi Y. · 1989 · 229
4. Ohama Y. · 1989 · 253
5. Diamond S. · 1992 · 269
6. Stark D. C. · 1992 · 1017
7. Stark D., Morgan B., Okamoto P., Diamond S. Eliminating or minimizing alkali-silica reactivity, 1993, Report SHRP-C-343, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC: 226.
8. 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00161-110.1016/0008-8846(95)00161-1 ↗
9. Durand B. · 1995 · 507
10. Bian Q. · 1996 · 868
11. Stokes D. B. · 1996 · 862
12. Blackwell B. Q. · 1997 · 649
13. 10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00003-310.1016/S0008-8846(97)00003-3 ↗
14. Stokes D. B. · 1997 · 855
15. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00115-510.1016/S0008-8846(99)00115-5 ↗
16. Durand B. · 2000 · 623
17. Thomas M. D. A. · 2000 · 783
18. 10.1016/S0958-9465(99)00015-310.1016/S0958-9465(99)00015-3 ↗
19. 10.1617/1386810.1617/13868 ↗
20. 10.1680/aric.1317910.1680/aric.13179 ↗
21. Moore A. E. · 1978 · 69
22. 10.1016/0008-8846(79)90038-310.1016/0008-8846(79)90038-3 ↗
23. Natesaiyer K. · 1986 · 466
24. 10.1016/0008-8846(93)90049-F10.1016/0008-8846(93)90049-F ↗
25. Association Française de Normalisation · 1991
26. Association Française de Normalisation · 1992
27. Canadian Standards Association · 1994
28. Pascal P. · 1966
29. Canadian Standards Association · 2000