Characterising cement carbonation curing using non-contact electrical resistivity measurement
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbonation curing of cement paste and concrete promotes early strength gain, improves durability and recycles carbon dioxide in a beneficial manner. To examine the carbonation curing mechanism, fresh cement pastes and concretes subject to carbonation are characterised using a non-contact electrical resistivity measurement method. Resistivity measurements reveal that characteristic features of the hydration accelerated by carbonation are different from conventional hydration. The typical induction period is absent in the carbonation curing owing to the rapid precipitation of calcium carbonate. The resistivity measurement method produces a superimposed result of early hardening and multiple instances of progressive hardening by carbonation curing. The electrical resistivity is 3–6 times higher in the carbonated cement paste and about 8–16 times higher in the carbonated concretes in comparison with the hydration references. The carbonated lightweight concrete shows lower bulk resistivity than the carbonated normal-weight concrete, possibly owing to the release of internal water from the lightweight aggregates during carbonation. This is evidence of internal curing by lightweight aggregates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Concrete Properties and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Assistant, Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI · 1999
2. ASTM · 2008
3. ASTM · 2008
4. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00608-110.1016/S0008-8846(01)00608-1 ↗
5. Bentz DP · 199910.6028/NIST.IR.6265 ↗
6. 10.1038/physci240016a010.1038/physci240016a0 ↗
7. Berhane Z · ACI Journal Proceedings · 1984 · 81 · 560
8. 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00156-510.1016/0008-8846(95)00156-5 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19046.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19046.x ↗
10. 10.1016/0008-8846(83)90057-110.1016/0008-8846(83)90057-1 ↗
11. 10.1680/adcr.2004.16.1.2910.1680/adcr.2004.16.1.29 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.002 ↗
13. Maries A · 1992
14. Matschei T
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.013 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0117467410.1007/BF01174674 ↗
17. 10.1080/21650373.2013.79737310.1080/21650373.2013.797373 ↗
18. Rostami V · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2011 · 24 · 122110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000462 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.025 ↗
20. Scrivener KL · 1989
21. Shideler JJ · 1955
22. Toennies HT · ACI Journal Proceedings · 1960 · 56 · 737
23. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.02710.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.027 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11420.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11420.x ↗