Influence of classical and modern superplasticisers on the chemical and rheological behaviour of oil well cement: a comparative study
Source abstract
Abstract
The need for cements with good workability for oil well drilling purposes makes a systematic study necessary in order to investigate different cement–admixture combinations. In the present study the superplasticising effect induced by third-generation polycarboxylates was benchmarked against conventional melamine-based superplasticisers on oil well cement. Two commercial superplasticisers were studied at five different concentrations. The hydration progress over time was analysed by way of monitoring the crystal growth using a scanning electron microscope. Infrared and 29Si solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were measured. Rheological and surface tension studies were conducted at the early stages of hydration. The results show clearly that the third-generation polycarboxylate under investigation was superior in terms of better cement workability. This superiority was attributed to the multi-branched nature of this compound which induced sterical repulsion on the cement grain surface. Moreover, the superplasticiser–cement complexed phases were found to be thermodynamically unstable as evidenced by infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra. Recommendations are made concerning the application of superplasticisers in the oil industry in order to enhance the performance of the drilling process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MSc student, Chemical Engineering Program, The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Assistant Professor, Chemical Engineering Program, The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. API (American Petroleum Institute) · 2004
2. Bassioni G · Applied Energy
3. Bassioni G · International Journal of Engineering · 2010 · 3 · 577
4. 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.02.01810.1016/j.fuel.2009.02.018 ↗
5. 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00104-K10.1016/0008-8846(95)00104-K ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00417-810.1016/S0008-8846(00)00417-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.04.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2008.04.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.02410.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.024 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.015 ↗
10. 10.1680/adcr.2000.12.4.15310.1680/adcr.2000.12.4.153 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.09.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.09.003 ↗
12. Pigeon M · 1995
13. Plank J · Verlag der Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung B · 2007 · 62 · 127710.1515/znb-2007-1008 ↗
14. Plank J · 2004 · 1
15. Plank J · ibausil-Tagungsband · 2006 · 16 · 579
16. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01042-610.1016/S0008-8846(02)01042-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.12.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.12.002 ↗
18. Schlumberger D · 1984
19. 10.1590/S1516-1439200700040000210.1590/S1516-14392007000400002 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.01.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.01.005 ↗