Amazon açaí fibre–Portland cement compatibility: a challenge to produce cement-bonded fibreboards?
Source abstract
Abstract
The açaí waste from the Amazon contains short fibres that show potential for reinforcing cement-bonded fibreboards (CBFBs), although their compatibility with the cement matrix is still unknown. The aim of this work was to characterise raw and pretreated açaí fibres and analyse their compatibility with Portland cement by different techniques, alongside developing a CBFB. The fibres were subjected to thermal (180, 200 and 220°C), cold and hot water, alkaline (NaOH) and bleaching (NaOH–H2O2) pretreatments. The chemical and water pretreatments raised the fibre crystalline indexes (28–57%). The chemical pretreatments individualised the fibre bundles and removed hemicelluloses. Alkali-pretreated and raw fibres had the highest (96%) and lowest (65%) cement compatibility indexes. Portlandite and ettringite appeared after 24 h for most pastes, but were delayed for raw and 220°C-pretreated fibres. In contrast, only the raw fibre specimens reached the required compression strength of 34 MPa after 28 days; hence, they were chosen to produce a CBFB. The boards showed proper thickness swelling (1.4%), but low bending strength (modulus of elasticity = 647.8 MPa; modulus of rupture = 1.9 MPa). Overall, the fibre modifications improved the compatibility with cement, but not the composite's mechanical strength. Açaí-fibre CBFB is a promising building material, but future studies must overcome its poor mechanical performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
PhD candidate, Post Graduation Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (BIONORTE), Belém, Brazil (corresponding author: )
Professor, State University of Amapá (UEAP), Macapá, Brazil
Professor, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristóvão, Brazil
PhD candidate, Federal University of Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, Brazil
Professor, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
Professor, Rural Federal University of the Amazon (UFRA), Belém, Brazil
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. ABNT (Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas) (1996) NBR 7215 – Portland cement – determination of compressive strength. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
2. ABNT (2018a) NBR 16697 – Portland cement – requirements. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
3. ABNT (2018b) NBR 5739 – Concrete: compression test of cylindric specimens – method of test. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
4. 10.4067/S0718-221X201100030000510.4067/S0718-221X2011000300005 ↗
5. 10.1166/jbmb.2015.154510.1166/jbmb.2015.1545 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.035 ↗
7. 10.3390/app1107303610.3390/app11073036 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.09010.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.090 ↗
9. 10.4067/S0718-5073201800020015510.4067/S0718-50732018000200155 ↗
10. 10.1007/s13196-018-0219-010.1007/s13196-018-0219-0 ↗
11. Braga DG · Cerne · 2021 · 27 · e-10278310.1590/01047760202127012783 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10570-015-0771-310.1007/s10570-015-0771-3 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.502723210.1063/1.5027232 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13221910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132219 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.acme.2018.02.01210.1016/j.acme.2018.02.012 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10570-010-9453-310.1007/s10570-010-9453-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10648110.1016/j.jobe.2023.106481 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.10.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2015.10.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
20. Ferreira RB · Revista Visa em Debate · 2014 · 2 · 4
21. Gartner EM · 2002 · 57
22. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.002 ↗
23. Guedes CEG · Journal of Natural Fibers · 2022 · 19 · 1
24. 10.1080/15440478.2021.187538010.1080/15440478.2021.1875380 ↗
25. 10.1177/00405175010710030810.1177/004051750107100308 ↗
26. Ji X · BioResources · 2015 · 10 · 2518
27. 10.1155/2020/839293510.1155/2020/8392935 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000345610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003456 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.14910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.149 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-022-25085-610.1038/s41598-022-25085-6 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.01410.1016/j.jmrt.2022.11.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.10634410.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106344 ↗
33. Liu Z · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · 2017 · 2017 · 1
34. 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.04.01010.1016/j.jaap.2012.04.010 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10973-018-7734-510.1007/s10973-018-7734-5 ↗
36. 10.1007/978-3-031-22576-5_5110.1007/978-3-031-22576-5_51 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.11190710.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111907 ↗
38. Marteinsson B · Open Journal of Composite Materials · 2018 · 8 · 2910.4236/ojcm.2018.81003 ↗
39. 10.3390/polym1505130910.3390/polym15051309 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.07.02110.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.07.021 ↗
41. Miller DP · Wood and Fiber Science · 1991 · 23 · 472
42. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11540010.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115400 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.04910.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.049 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.03.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.03.007 ↗
45. 10.3390/polym1310154710.3390/polym13101547 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00061-110.1016/S0958-9465(03)00061-1 ↗
47. 10.1002/cbdv.20190027510.1002/cbdv.201900275 ↗
48. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100783-9.00003-410.1016/B978-0-08-100783-9.00003-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jaap.2010.03.00610.1016/j.jaap.2010.03.006 ↗
50. 10.3390/polym1410204310.3390/polym14102043 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11785610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117856 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12123210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121232 ↗
53. Santos EBC · Materials Research · 2018 · 21 · e20170365
54. 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00038-910.1016/S0958-9465(98)00038-9 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.00110.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.001 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.07810.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.078 ↗
57. 10.1007/s11029-023-10087-w10.1007/s11029-023-10087-w ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13218610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132186 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.12.25510.1016/j.jmrt.2023.12.255 ↗
60. Souza M (1994) Durability of Cement-Bonded Particle Board Made Conventionally and Carbon Dioxide Injection. Doctorate in Forest Sciences thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
61. 10.1590/0104-1428.0981910.1590/0104-1428.09819 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10377510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103775 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.01810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.018 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.10493810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104938 ↗
65. Vaickelionis G · Ceramics – Silikáty · 2006 · 50 · 115
66. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.01010.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.010 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.01910.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.019 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.10310.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.103 ↗
69. 10.3390/polym1105075110.3390/polym11050751 ↗
70. Yilmazer S · Maderas. Ciencia y Tecnología · 2023 · 25 · 1
71. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.08.02410.1016/j.carbpol.2006.08.024 ↗
72. 10.1007/s12221-016-5744-010.1007/s12221-016-5744-0 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.024 ↗