journal article·2018-09Open access

Chemical aspects related to using recycled geopolymers as aggregates

Napoleana Anna Chaliasou, Andrew Heath, Kevin Paine, Juliana Calabria Holley

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 30· Issue 8

Abstract

Despite extensive research into sustainability of geopolymers, end-of-life aspects have been largely overlooked. A recycling scenario is examined in this study. This requires an investigation of alkali leaching potential from a geopolymeric matrix. To study the feasibility of geopolymer cement (GPC) recycling, the migration of alkalis was evaluated for the first time on a microstructural level through energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) elemental mapping and leaching tests. Macroscale impacts were assessed through an investigation of Portland cement (PC) mortar properties affected by alkali concentration. Leaching tests indicated that alkalis immediately become available in aqueous environments, but the majority remain chemically or physically bound in the matrix. This type of leaching accelerates the initial setting of PC paste. Elemental mapping and EDX/SEM analysis showed a complex paste–aggregate interfacial transition zone. Exchange of calcium and sodium, revealed by the maps, resulted in the migration of sodium into the PC paste and the formation of additional calcium–silicon-based phases in the geopolymeric matrix. Strength values of mortars with 25% and 50% recycled aggregates (RA) showed negligible differences compared with the reference sample. Screening tests indicated a low potential for GPC RA inducing alkali–silica reaction. Transport of GPC RA alkalis and the underlying mechanisms were observed. This transport phenomenon was found to have minor effects on the properties of the PC mortar, indicating that recycling of geopolymers is a viable reuse practice.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PhD Researcher, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials (BRE CICM), Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK (corresponding author: )

Professor of Geomaterials, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials (BRE CICM), Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK

Reader in Civil Engineering, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials (BRE CICM), Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK

Lecturer, BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials (BRE CICM), Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.037 ↗
2. ASTM · 2014
3. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00766-410.1016/S0008-8846(02)00766-4 ↗
4. BSI (1999) BS EN 1015-11: Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. BSI, London, UK.
5. BSI (2006a) BS EN 1744-6:2006: Tests for chemical properties of aggregates. Determination of the influence of recycled aggregate extract on the initial setting time of cement. BSI, London, UK.
6. BSI (2006b) BS EN 1744-1:2009+A1:2012: Tests for chemical properties of aggregates. Chemical analysis. BSI, London, UK.
7. BSI (2009) BS EN 12390-3: Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. BSI, London, UK.
8. BSI (2011) BS EN 197-1: Cement. Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. BSI, London, UK.
9. BSI (2012) BS EN 450-1: Fly ash for concrete. Definition, specifications and conformity criteria. BSI, London, UK.
10. BSI (2016a) BS EN 196-1: Methods of testing cement. Determination of strength. BSI, London, UK.
11. BSI (2016b) BS EN 196-3: Methods of testing cement. Determination of setting times and soundness. BSI, London, UK.
12. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.03.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.03.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.003 ↗
15. De Pauw P · 1998 · 213
16. 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z ↗
17. Gress DL · Waste Materials in Construction · 2000 · 1 · 221
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.17510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.175 ↗
19. 10.1680/coma.12.0003010.1680/coma.12.00030 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00187-810.1016/S0008-8846(99)00187-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.03010.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.030 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.09.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/0008-8846(78)90056-X10.1016/0008-8846(78)90056-X ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.01.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2015.01.017 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-009-3934-510.1007/s10853-009-3934-5 ↗
26. Kwan WH · Construction and Building Materials · 2012 · 26 · 565
27. 10.3390/ma611506910.3390/ma6115069 ↗
28. 10.3390/su205120410.3390/su2051204 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.01010.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010 ↗
30. Mota Gassó B (2015) Impact of Alkali Salts on the Kinetics and Microstructural Development of Cementitious Systems. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale De Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
31. 10.1039/C5DT01124H10.1039/C5DT01124H ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.02.00110.1016/j.mechrescom.2014.02.001 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.02410.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.024 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.10110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.101 ↗
36. 10.1680/adcr.1999.11.4.18910.1680/adcr.1999.11.4.189 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.03110.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.031 ↗
38. 10.1680/adcr.1987.1.1.510.1680/adcr.1987.1.1.5 ↗