Microstructure and physical properties of fly-ash-based geopolymer with the addition of expanded vermiculite
Source abstract
Abstract
Fly-ash-based geopolymer pastes with the addition of expanded vermiculite (EV) powder were synthesised and their microstructure, compressive strength, setting time, moisture control, extent of efflorescence and thermal conductivity were studied. It was found that the addition of EV resulted in an increase in the standard-consistency water consumption and setting times. As a consequence, excessive addition of EV resulted in a larger amount of harmful pores, which was detrimental for the compressive strength of the paste. However, geopolymer pastes with an appropriate amount of EV (2–7 wt%) showed a slight increase in compressive strength because of the filler effect. Mg2+ and Fe3+ diffused from the EV interlayers through ion exchange between the EV and the geopolymer, and participated in geopolymerisation. This was reflected by the formation of N-(M)-A-(F)-S-H, as evidenced by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. In addition, Na+/Mg2+ or Na+/Fe3+ ion exchange reduced the mobility of Na+ the ions and therefore decreased the extent of efflorescence. Moreover, EV addition favoured an improvement in moisture content and the thermal conductivity properties of the geopolymer paste.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Clay minerals and soil interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Senior Engineer, School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hunan City University, Yiyang, China (corresponding author: )
Associate Professor, School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hunan City University, Yiyang, China
Lecturer, School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hunan City University, Yiyang, China
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.clema.2022.10006110.1016/j.clema.2022.100061 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.11110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.111 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10406210.1016/j.jobe.2022.104062 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12761610.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127616 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13244910.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132449 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12127810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121278 ↗
7. Davidovits J · 2008
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.09510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.095 ↗
9. Durak U · Structural Concrete · 2020 · 22 · E352
10. 10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00070-610.1016/S0958-9465(00)00070-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.clay.2018.04.01010.1016/j.clay.2018.04.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.08610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.086 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.05710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.057 ↗
14. 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.610.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.6 ↗
15. Hu MY · Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (Natural Science Edition) · 2017 · 49 · 790
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.953.22310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.953.223 ↗
17. 10.1080/0371750X.2020.171920610.1080/0371750X.2020.1719206 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.01.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10444310.1016/j.jobe.2022.104443 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11954710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119547 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12187710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121877 ↗
22. Li GS · Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society · 2005 · 35 · 604
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.11310.1016/j.ceramint.2021.11.113 ↗
24. Liang WD · Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology · 2017 · 40 · 38
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10831110.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108311 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.11610.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.116 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.14510.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.145 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.21910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.219 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.075 ↗
30. Phoo-Ngernkham T · Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences · 2013 · 20 · 310
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.04910.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.049 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.019 ↗
33. 10.5755/j02.ms.2679610.5755/j02.ms.26796 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.10210.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.102 ↗
35. 10.1023/A:102631261984310.1023/A:1026312619843 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10973-011-1766-410.1007/s10973-011-1766-4 ↗
37. 10.1088/1757-899X/732/1/01203110.1088/1757-899X/732/1/012031 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.00410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.004 ↗
39. Wang SF · Materials Review B · 2018 · 32 · 2757
40. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.03910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.039 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.038 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.09910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.099 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.013 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12511210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125112 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.004 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.08410.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.084 ↗
47. Zuo YB · Materials · 2018 · 1 · 11