Strength characteristics of microbial cement mortars treated in different calcium sources
Source abstract
Abstract
Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation is a method for the protection of cement-based materials. This paper deals with the strength characteristics of microbial cement mortars, which are treated by the Enterobacter sp. FJ 973550 microorganism in different calcium sources (calcium hydroxide, calcium acetate, calcium chloride and calcium oxide). The crystalline phases of calcium carbonate crystal formation and the surface morphology of cement mortar are investigated by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. Microbial cement mortar specimens treated in calcium hydroxide source show higher compressive strength (∼29%) and tensile strength (∼47%) compared to control specimens. Surface treatment of specimens with bacteria resulted in an approximately 56% decrease in water absorption and increased the resistance to water and hazard material penetration. This biological surface treatment shows promising prospects for increasing strength and durability aspects of cement mortar specimens.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathamangalam, India
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, KSR College of Engineering, Tiruchencode, India
Assistant Professor, Department of Physics, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathamangalam, India
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000015910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000159 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10295-010-0901-810.1007/s10295-010-0901-8 ↗
3. Attiogbe KE · ACI Materials Journal · 1988 · 85 · 481
4. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00872-410.1016/S0008-8846(02)00872-4 ↗
5. BIS · 1988
6. BIS · 1991
7. BIS · 1991
8. Castanier S · Sediment Geology · 1999 · 126 · 9
9. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.005 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10532-005-9006-x10.1007/s10532-005-9006-x ↗
11. 10.1016/S0012-8252(98)00034-810.1016/S0012-8252(98)00034-8 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.005 ↗
13. Ghosh P · Indian Journal Experimental Biology · 2006 · 44 · 336
14. Kong HL · ACI Materials Journal · 1987 · 84 · 110
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.02.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2006.02.010 ↗
16. Mehta PK · Concrete International · 1999 · 21 · 69
17. Nokken MR · Cement and Concrete Aggregate · 2002 · 24 · 2010.1520/CCA10487J ↗
18. Ramachandran SK · ACI Materials Journal · 2001 · 98 · 3
19. Ramakrishnan V · 1998 · 597
20. 10.1128/AEM.69.4.2182-2193.200310.1128/AEM.69.4.2182-2193.2003 ↗
21. Soroka I . Portland Cement Paste and Concrete, 1979, Macmillan Press, London, UK, 151–152.10.1007/978-1-349-03994-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00082-610.1016/S0038-0717(99)00082-6 ↗
23. Stutzman PE · 1996