Solvent exchange in sulfoaluminate phases. Part II: monosulfate
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of organic solvent exchange techniques on the microstructure and the dimensional stability of monosulfate (3CaO.Al2O3.CaSO4.12H2O) was critically investigated. Monosulfate samples were treated with methanol, ethanol and isopropanol, and examined by different analytical techniques including X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermal gravimetric analysis and scanning electrom microscopy. Nitrogen surface area measurements (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method) and length-change of the monosulfate samples in the solvents were also recorded. Evidence was obtained that indicates monosulfate was readily dehydrated from 12 water molecules to ten water molecules once it was treated by the investigated alcohols. The alcohol molecules, however, likely intercalated into the monosulfate structure, limiting an expected decrease in the interlayer distance of the monosulfate structure. Methanol had the greatest damaging effect on the monosulfate microstructure. Ethanol, however, resulted in higher long-term expansion owing to its intermediate molecular size and reactivity with monosulfate compared to methanol and isopropanol.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Visiting worker, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Researcher Emeritus, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Senior Research Officer, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Chief Executive Officer, Giatec Scientific Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Allmann R · Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie Monatsheft · 1977 · 3 · 136
2. 10.1016/0008-8846(83)90030-310.1016/0008-8846(83)90030-3 ↗
3. Beaudoin JJ · Il Cemento · 1986 · 83 · 199
4. 10.1007/BF0247272310.1007/BF02472723 ↗
5. Beaudoin JJ · Advances in Cement Based Materials · 1983 · 8 · 5610.1016/S1065-7355(98)00008-X ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00260-410.1016/S0008-8846(99)00260-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/0008-8846(81)90106-X10.1016/0008-8846(81)90106-X ↗
8. 10.1016/0008-8846(71)90004-410.1016/0008-8846(71)90004-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/0008-8846(72)90028-210.1016/0008-8846(72)90028-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/0008-8846(87)90133-510.1016/0008-8846(87)90133-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/0008-8846(91)90011-610.1016/0008-8846(91)90011-6 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00177-410.1016/S0730-725X(96)00177-4 ↗
13. Khoshnazar R · Advances in Cement Research · 2013
14. Kuzel HJ · Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie Monatsheft · 1965 · 7 · 193
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2011.09.005 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp051565q10.1021/jp051565q ↗
17. Mikhail RS · 1966 · 122
18. 10.1016/0008-8846(81)90023-510.1016/0008-8846(81)90023-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/0008-8846(83)90123-010.1016/0008-8846(83)90123-0 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.06.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2006.06.008 ↗
21. Sereda PJ · Journal of Applied Chemistry · 1963 · 13 · 15010.1002/jctb.5010130402 ↗
22. Soroka I · 1968 · 67
23. Taylor HFW · 1990
24. Taylor HFW · Cement and Concrete Research · 1987 · 17 · 614
25. 10.1680/adcr.1989.2.5.2910.1680/adcr.1989.2.5.29 ↗
26. 10.1680/adcr.2000.12.2.7910.1680/adcr.2000.12.2.79 ↗