journal article·2023-12-01

Analysis of the relationship between the L-box test and the yield stress of fresh concrete: an analytical approach

Raoudha Sassi, Ahmed Jelidi, Sami Montassar

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 35· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The objective of this work was to study fresh concrete flow in the L-box test, predict the final deposit shape after flow stoppage and estimate the yield stress. This is very useful for controlling concrete casting in real structures, detecting problems and developing solutions on time. Concrete rheometers used for measuring the rheological parameters of concrete are expensive, not always available and can lead to measurement disparity. To overcome these issues, an effective method is to analyse concrete flow phenomena physically and solve the problem analytically based on L-box measurements. In the first part of this work, fresh concrete was considered as a homogeneous yield stress fluid moving under the effect of its self-weight. By developing momentum equations for an incompressible fluid, a theoretical approach was used to study three probable final shapes depending on the concrete rheology. Expressions were established for predicting the final shape and the yield stress. In the second part, the results obtained were compared with those of previous models and good agreement was found, thus validating the proposed approach. This study provides a consolidation of rheometer results, allowing evaluation and perhaps a calibration to reinforce their validity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · BIM and Construction Integration · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PhD Researcher, Laboratory of Civil Engineering (LGC), the National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT), Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia (corresponding author: )

Lecturer, Laboratory of Civil Engineering (LGC), National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT), Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Bartos PJM · 2002
2. 10.1007/s41062-022-00766-310.1007/s41062-022-00766-3 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.504241010.1063/1.5042410 ↗
4. Cho CG · Materials Research Innovations · 2015 · 19 · 114
5. Christensen G (1991) Modelling the Flow of Fresh Concrete: The Slump Test. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
6. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.08.00410.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.08.004 ↗
7. Estellé P · 2013 · 205
8. Ferraris CF and Brower LE (2001) Comparison of Concrete Rheometers: International Tests at LCPC (Nantes, France) in October, 2000. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, NISTIR 6819.10.6028/NIST.IR.6819 ↗
9. Ferraris CF and Brower LE (2004) Comparison of Concrete Rheometers: International Tests at MB (Cleveland OH, USA) in May, 2003. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, NISTIR 7154.10.6028/NIST.IR.7154 ↗
10. Ferraris CF and De Larrard F (1998) Testing and Modelling of Fresh Concrete Rheology. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, NISTIR 6094. See https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6094.10.6028/NIST.IR.6094 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.02710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.027 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.009 ↗
13. 10.1680/macr.12.0011510.1680/macr.12.00115 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.004 ↗
15. 10.1098/rsta.2009.019410.1098/rsta.2009.0194 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2005.05.01110.1016/j.mechrescom.2005.05.011 ↗
17. Murata J · Materials and Construction · 1984 · 17 · 117
18. Nagaraj A · Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering · 2021 · 9 · 118
19. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.04.01510.1016/j.compstruc.2008.04.015 ↗
21. 10.1617/s11527-007-9313-210.1617/s11527-007-9313-2 ↗
22. 10.1617/s11527-007-9230-410.1617/s11527-007-9230-4 ↗
23. 10.1122/1.187904110.1122/1.1879041 ↗
24. Roussel N and Gram A (eds) (2014) Simulation of Fresh Concrete Flow: State-of-the Art Report of the RILEM Technical Committee 222-SCF. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, vol. 15. See https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8884-7.10.1007/978-94-017-8884-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.005 ↗
26. Sedran T (1999) Rhéologie et Rhéométrie Des Bétons. Application Aux Bétons Auto-Plaçants. PhD thesis, ENPC University, Nantes, France.
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.05610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.056 ↗
28. Tanigawa Y · 1986 · 129
29. Tattersall GH · 1983
30. 10.1533/9780857095282.3.25910.1533/9780857095282.3.259 ↗
31. Thrane LN · Annual Transactions of the Nordic Rheology Society · 2004 · 12 · 47
32. 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2019.9210.21809/rilemtechlett.2019.92 ↗
33. Wallevik J (2003) Rheology of Particle Suspensions – Fresh Concrete, Mortar and Cement Paste with Various Types of Lignosulfonates. PhD thesis, NTNU University, Trondheim, Norway.
34. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100693-1.00007-210.1016/B978-0-08-100693-1.00007-2 ↗