Atomistic dynamics simulation to solve conformation of model PCE superplasticisers in water and cement pore solution
Source abstract
Abstract
The working mechanism of polycarboxylate ether (PCE) type superplasticisers in concrete was studied from the point of view of conformational changes of the polymer simulated by molecular dynamics in pure water and cement pore solution. Three typical types of PCEs, namely a methoxy polyethyleneglycol monomethacrylate–sodium methacrylate copolymer (PCEM), a polyethyleneglycol mono allyl ether–sodium maleate copolymer (PCEA) and a polyethyleneglycol mono (3-methyl-3-butenyl) ether–sodium acrylate copolymer (PCEI) were investigated using large-scale atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. It was observed that the PCE polymers which possess negatively charged backbones were stretched in water due to electrostatic repulsion. However, they were found to be significantly shrunken and distorted in synthetic cement pore solution, depending on the polyethylene glycol (PEG) density along the backbone, resulting in the aggregation of PEG side chains due to the salting-out effect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Division, Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan (corresponding author: )
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of High Performance Computing, A*Star, Connexis, Singapore
Fine & Specialty Chemicals Research Center, Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan
Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/app.1959.07001011010.1002/app.1959.070010110 ↗
2. Bailey FE · Journal of Polymer Science, Part A, Polymer Chemistry · 1964 · 2 · 845
3. 10.1039/a703436i10.1039/a703436i ↗
4. 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E ↗
5. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.03.00810.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.03.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/0001-8686(87)85003-010.1016/0001-8686(87)85003-0 ↗
7. 10.1021/ma00022a00810.1021/ma00022a008 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00888.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00888.x ↗
9. 10.1021/la801410e10.1021/la801410e ↗
10. 10.1016/S0001-8686(01)00062-810.1016/S0001-8686(01)00062-8 ↗
11. 10.1021/ct700200b10.1021/ct700200b ↗
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
13. 10.1021/ct700301q10.1021/ct700301q ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.04.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2008.04.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-510.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
16. Jeknavorian AA · 1997 · 55
17. 10.1021/ja962176010.1021/ja9621760 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.008 ↗
19. Kinoshita M · 1997 · 143
20. 10.1021/la062607k10.1021/la062607k ↗
21. Lange A · 2012 · 435
22. 10.1007/s00894010004510.1007/s008940100045 ↗
23. 10.1134/S1061933X1002019510.1134/S1061933X10020195 ↗
24. Mishra RK · 2012 · 235
25. Mohan R · International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering · 2014 · 8 · 84
26. 10.3151/jact.4.22510.3151/jact.4.225 ↗
27. 10.3151/jact.1.510.3151/jact.1.5 ↗
28. Paas J · 2015 · 199
29. Pickelmann J · 2015 · 25
30. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.010 ↗
31. Sakai E · 1997 · 187
32. Shonaka M · 1997 · 599
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.127 ↗
34. 10.1002/jcc.2029110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
35. Teresa M · Journal of Chromatography A · 2001 · 919 · 1310.1016/S0021-9673(01)00802-0 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0008-8846(96)00207-410.1016/S0008-8846(96)00207-4 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.006 ↗
38. Yoshioka K · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 1997 · 80 · 266710.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03169.x ↗