journal article·2014-12

Impact of anhydrite proportion in a calcium sulfoaluminate cement and Portland cement blend

Romain Trauchessec, Jean-Michel Mechling, André Lecomte, André Roux, Bruno Le Rolland

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 26· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cement and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) blends are innovative binders. In comparison with OPC, these mixtures can reduce the environmental impact of cement production as well as increase the hardening speed. This article deals with the effects of calcium sulfate (anhydrite) percentage on hydration mechanisms, compressive strength and dimensional stability of binders containing 40% OPC. Calcium sulfate quantity is an essential parameter that can be used to control the hardening speed and dimensional stability. Mortars with 6·5% and 10% anhydrite present moderate compressive strength and expansion, whereas higher compressive strength and expansion are obtained with blends containing 17% and 20·5% anhydrite. These anhydrite proportions slow down the OPC and CSA clinker hydration kinetics but increase the ettringite proportion and stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PhD Student, Université de Lorraine – Institut Jean Lamour, UMR 7198-CNRS, CP2S, Matériaux pour le Génie Civil, Nancy, France

Associate Professor, Université de Lorraine – Institut Jean Lamour, UMR 7198-CNRS, CP2S, Matériaux pour le Génie Civil, Nancy, France

Professor, Université de Lorraine – Institut Jean Lamour, UMR 7198-CNRS, CP2S, Matériaux pour le Génie Civil, Nancy, France

R&D Engineer, CTG, Italcementi Group, Guerville, France

R&D Team Manager, CTG, Italcementi Group, Guerville, France

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1680/adcr.2004.16.2.6910.1680/adcr.2004.16.2.69 ↗
2. 10.1080/19648189.2010.969324810.1080/19648189.2010.9693248 ↗
3. Gastaldi D · 142
4. 10.1016/0008-8846(89)90038-010.1016/0008-8846(89)90038-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.004 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.368-373.47810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.368-373.478 ↗
7. Marchi M · 191
8. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.010 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.06510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.065 ↗
10. 10.1680/cien.2009.162.2.6410.1680/cien.2009.162.2.64 ↗
11. Puertas F · ZKG International · 1997 · 50 · 232
12. Quillin K · 2007
13. Wang J · 2010
14. Winnefeld F · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · 2009 · 101 · 94910.1007/s10973-009-0582-6 ↗