journal article·2024-04-01

Performance of cement mortar mixes containing fine reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates and zinc waste

Surendra Kumar Saini, Surya Kant Sahdeo, G. D. Ransinchung RN, Praveen Kumar

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 36· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Cement mortar mixes were prepared to test the suitability of fine reclaimed asphalt pavement (FRAP) aggregates as a replacement for natural fine aggregates (NFA). With different amounts of NFA (25%, 50%, 75% and 100% by weight) replaced with FRAP aggregates, the mechanical qualities of the mortar mix deteriorated. To counteract this, jarosite – a waste from the zinc industry – was used as a partial replacement for cement (replacements of 5%, 10% and 15%). The jarosite improved the microstructural, mechanical and shrinkage properties. For example, compared with the control mix (100% NFA), the mix containing 25% FRAP aggregates showed a 5.5% reduction in hardened density and a 14% reduction in compressive strength. With the addition of 10% jarosite, there was an increase of 4.85% in hardened density and 7% in compressive strength with respect to the mix containing 25% FRAP aggregates. It is thus suggested that 10% jarosite is used when FRAP aggregates are used to make cement mortar mixes. A cost analysis was also performed. The findings of this work are expected to inspire rational mix design recommendations for mortar mixes including FRAP aggregates, as well as bringing environmental and economic benefits by reducing carbon dioxide footprints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Technical University, Kota, India

Assistant Professor, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala, India

Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India (corresponding author: )

Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.069 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.075 ↗
3. 10.3390/su804038410.3390/su8040384 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.05410.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.054 ↗
5. Bida SM · International Journal of Science and Research · 2016 · 5 · 65
6. Brand AS, Roesler JR, Al-Qadi IL and Shangguan P (2012) Fractionated Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (FRAP) as a Coarse Aggregate Replacement in a Ternary Blended Concrete Pavement. Illinois Center for Transportation, Urbana, IL, USA, Report No. ICT-12-008.
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.072 ↗
8. Debbarma S · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2019 · 22 · 156810.1080/10298436.2019.1703981 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000327810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003278 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12041710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120417 ↗
11. 10.1007/s13369-019-03801-110.1007/s13369-019-03801-1 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2019.170258310.1080/14680629.2019.1702583 ↗
13. Hassan KE · Waste Materials in Construction · 2012 · 1 · 121
14. Hossiney N · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2010 · 3 · 251
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.05.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2005.05.002 ↗
16. 10.1680/macr.2006.58.5.31310.1680/macr.2006.58.5.313 ↗
17. Kangas P · Miner · 2017 · 2017 · 3434
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11926010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119260 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.10.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.10.002 ↗
20. Kockal AL · Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions of Mechanical Engineering · 2013 · 37 · 67
21. Kockal NU · Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences · 2015 · 22 · 203
22. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.05510.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.055 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.01510.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.015 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.009 ↗
25. Naik TR · 1997
26. NRMCA ( · 2018
27. 10.32047/cwb.2019.24.6.110.32047/cwb.2019.24.6.1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.14710.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.147 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.000054010.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000540 ↗
30. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102001-2.00020-610.1016/B978-0-08-102001-2.00020-6 ↗
31. PCA (Portland Cement Association) · 2001
32. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12254610.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122546 ↗
33. Sahdeo SK · 2019 · 383
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000355510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003555 ↗
35. 10.1007/s13369-022-06892-510.1007/s13369-022-06892-5 ↗
36. 10.1007/s41062-021-00707-610.1007/s41062-021-00707-6 ↗
37. 10.1061/JPEODX.000016210.1061/JPEODX.0000162 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.144 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.030 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.13110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.131 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000212410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002124 ↗
42. 10.1080/10298436.2019.156792010.1080/10298436.2019.1567920 ↗
43. 10.5276/JSWTM.2012.16910.5276/JSWTM.2012.169 ↗
44. 10.4334/IJCSM.2009.3.2.09110.4334/IJCSM.2009.3.2.091 ↗
45. USEPA ( · 2015
46. Zayed AM · 2004