Polycarboxylate/nanosilica-modified quaternary cement formulations – enhancements and limitations
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of polycarboxylate/nanosilica (nS) particles in quaternary cement formulations comprising Portland cement (PC), limestone powder (LS) and fly ash (FA) was investigated for the first time. The reference formulation contained 60% PC, 20% LS and 20% FA by mass of binder in an effort to minimise clinker and maximise the other constituents. nS particles were characterised by way of transmission and X-ray scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The nS was added at 0·3 or 0·6% by mass as a partial replacement for PC and different water-to-binder (w/b) ratios were explored. Compressive strength tests and thermal gravimetric analyses (TGA) performed at day 7, 28 and 56 testified to pozzolanic behaviour. Results suggest a mechanism of ‘de-activation’ of some FA particles with age. A new ratio: (compressive strength in MPa)/(calcium hydroxide content detected by TGA) was introduced, correlating microscale characteristics (hydration products) and macroscale performance (delivered compressive strengths). Back-scattered SEM images confirmed the calcium–silicate–hydrate (C–S–H) network formation, the presence of reacted/unreacted FA particles and the availability of calcium hydroxide for delayed hydration reactions. Tests on mortars also confirmed the enhancement offered by nS addition. The lower bound nS addition was determined to be 0·6% by mass of binder for pastes and 0·5% for mortars.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hellenic Ministry of Culture, General Directorate of Restoration of Medieval and Post-medieval Monuments, Athens, Greece
BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, University of Bath, Bath, UK (corresponding author: )
BRE Centre for Innovative Construction Materials, University of Bath, Bath, UK
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.05.07110.1016/j.cplett.2004.05.071 ↗
2. 10.1680/pc.3611610.1680/pc.36116 ↗
3. 10.1680/adcr.13.0009810.1680/adcr.13.00098 ↗
4. Collier NC · Ceramics – Silikaty · 2016 · 60 · 33810.13168/cs.2016.0050 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.01410.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.006 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tca.2011.02.00310.1016/j.tca.2011.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.01310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.066 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10973-005-7302-710.1007/s10973-005-7302-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00153-210.1016/S0008-8846(99)00153-2 ↗
13. Papatzani S · 2014
14. 10.1179/1743284715Y.000000006710.1179/1743284715Y.0000000067 ↗
15. Papatzani S · Цемент и его применение (Cement and its Applications) · 2014 · 4 · 80
16. Papatzani S · 2014
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.029 ↗
18. Pourhossaini MR · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · 2012 · 124 · 472110.1002/app.35514 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma302091810.3390/ma3020918 ↗
20. Scrivener KL · Nanotechnology in Construction 3 · 2009 · 3710.1007/978-3-642-00980-8_4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.02610.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.026 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.127 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.05210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.052 ↗
24. 10.1617/s11527-014-0329-010.1617/s11527-014-0329-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.003 ↗