Pozzolanic efficiency of calcined clays in blended cements with a focus on early hydration
Source abstract
Abstract
Fundamental knowledge about the reaction mechanism of calcined clays in cement and their mutual interaction is important for their assessment as supplementary cementitious materials and the resulting concrete properties. In this study, the hydration of two cements differing in alkali content and with the addition of a highly reactive, aluminium-rich metakaolin and a calcined common clay with low kaolinite content was investigated during the first 48 h. For this purpose, four established methods that describe the early hydration were used: isothermal calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, in situ X-ray diffraction and chemical analysis of pore solution. This as yet unique combination of methods led to greater understanding of the hydration behaviour of the complex binder (cement–calcined clay). The results showed considerable differences depending on the type of calcined clay, its chemical–mineralogical composition and fineness, especially with regards its reaction mechanism with aluminate clinker phases controlled by the composition of the pore solution. The impact of calcined clay on early clinker hydration extends far beyond well known physical effects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Construction Materials, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany (corresponding author: )
Institute for Construction Materials, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2012.09.006 ↗
2. Beuntner N (2017) Zur Eignung und Wirkungsweise Calcinierter Tone als Reaktive Bindemittelkomponente in Zement. Dr.Ing. doctoral thesis, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany (in German).
3. Beuntner N · 2019
4. 10.1007/978-94-017-9939-3_610.1007/978-94-017-9939-3_6 ↗
5. Beuntner N · 2016 · 157
6. Beuntner N · 2019 · 470
7. Beuntner N · ACI Materials Journal · 2019 · 116 · 1910.14359/51716677 ↗
8. Buchwald A · 2003 · 91
9. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.011 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.174334510.1063/1.1743345 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.00710.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.007 ↗
12. Danner T · European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering · 2019 · 25 · 164710.1080/19648189.2019.1590741 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_1510.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_15 ↗
14. DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) (1976) DIN 66145: Graphical representation of particle size distribution; RRSB-grid. DIN, Berlin, Germany.
15. DIN (2003) DIN ISO 9277:2003-05 Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption using the BET method. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
16. DIN (2009) DIN EN ISO 118852009-09: Water quality – determination of selected elements by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
17. DIN (2015) DIN EN ISO 17892-3:2016-07: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing – Laboratory testing of soil – Part 3: Determination of particle density. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
18. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.013 ↗
19. 10.1154/1.214620710.1154/1.2146207 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.01410.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.014 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.09.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.09.010 ↗
22. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2020) ISO 13320:2020: Particle size analysis – laser diffraction methods. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
23. 10.1107/S002188981102593310.1107/S0021889811025933 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.017 ↗
25. 10.1617/s11527-009-9519-610.1617/s11527-009-9519-6 ↗
26. Kaps C · 2002
27. 10.1107/S056774088001046110.1107/S0567740880010461 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000386110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003861 ↗
29. 10.1016/0025-5408(88)90019-010.1016/0025-5408(88)90019-0 ↗
30. Longuet P · 1973
31. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_510.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_5 ↗
33. 10.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_910.1007/978-981-15-2806-4_9 ↗
34. 10.1016/0008-8846(88)90014-210.1016/0008-8846(88)90014-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.013 ↗
36. 10.1107/S056774087500363910.1107/S0567740875003639 ↗
37. 10.1016/0008-8846(83)90109-610.1016/0008-8846(83)90109-6 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.15710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.157 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.clay.2019.10516810.1016/j.clay.2019.105168 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.01810.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.018 ↗
41. 10.1107/S010876811203042X10.1107/S010876811203042X ↗
42. 10.1007/978-94-024-1207-9_6910.1007/978-94-024-1207-9_69 ↗
43. 10.1107/S160057671801288810.1107/S1600576718012888 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.10638210.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106382 ↗
45. 10.1524/zkri.2000.215.12.70710.1524/zkri.2000.215.12.707 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.013 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.02610.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.026 ↗
48. 10.1617/s11527-015-0527-410.1617/s11527-015-0527-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10579910.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105799 ↗
51. 10.1111/jace.1248010.1111/jace.12480 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10359410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103594 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.05.01710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.05.017 ↗
54. 10.1524/zkri.1980.152.14.25910.1524/zkri.1980.152.14.259 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.clay.2014.09.00910.1016/j.clay.2014.09.009 ↗
56. 10.1007/s10973-014-3816-110.1007/s10973-014-3816-1 ↗
57. Tironi A · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2017 · 29 · 810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001965 ↗
58. 10.1680/jadcr.14.0009510.1680/jadcr.14.00095 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10591810.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105918 ↗