journal article·2018-03

Pozzolanic activity assessment of calcined clays with complex minerals content

Branimir Bratoev, Ivan Doykov, Jordan Ninov, Alexander Lenchev

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 30· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The present work deals with the possibilities for using calcined clays of different compositions and mineral content as pozzolanic admixtures to cement mortars. The optimal burning conditions for each type of selected clay are determined according to the losses on ignition. The contribution of the main clay minerals to formation of the total pozzolanic activity by the burning process is evaluated by way of various physical, chemical (Frattini, Chapelle and the method of active admixtures) and mechanical (strength activity index) methods. The pozzolanic properties of the calcined clays are determined by 30% cement replacement. A calculation procedure for the prediction of the pozzolanic activity of burned clays, depending on their raw mineral content, is proposed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Building materials and conservation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Building Materials and Insulations, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Sofia, Bulgaria

Department of Building Materials and Insulations, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Sofia, Bulgaria (corresponding author: )

Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Sofia University ‘St Kliment Ohridski’, Sofia, Bulgaria

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Anthony J · 2003
2. 10.1590/S1516-1439200400020002410.1590/S1516-14392004000200024 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb14315.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb14315.x ↗
4. 10.1016/j.clay.2009.08.02610.1016/j.clay.2009.08.026 ↗
5. 10.1107/S002188987500945410.1107/S0021889875009454 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.00810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.013 ↗
8. Fernandez Lopez R · 2009
9. 10.13168/AGG.2015.002610.13168/AGG.2015.0026 ↗
10. Földvári M · 2011
11. 10.1021/jp502529d10.1021/jp502529d ↗
12. 10.1007/978-94-017-9939-3_1510.1007/978-94-017-9939-3_15 ↗
13. Grim R · The American Mineralogist · 1961 · 46 · 1329
14. 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00165-410.1016/0008-8846(95)00165-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/0169-1317(94)00033-M10.1016/0169-1317(94)00033-M ↗
16. 10.1016/0169-1317(95)00037-210.1016/0169-1317(95)00037-2 ↗
17. Kurtins K (2007) Metakaolin, Lauren McCormick. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, Material Science of Concrete – CEE 8813, pp. 1–27.
18. 10.1180/claymin.1996.031.1.0410.1180/claymin.1996.031.1.04 ↗
19. 10.1016/0008-8846(83)90052-210.1016/0008-8846(83)90052-2 ↗
20. Parhizkar T · Transaction A: Civil Engineering · 2010 · 17 · 450
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.730-732.43310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.730-732.433 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.001 ↗
23. Ross C and Hendricks S (1945) Minerals of the Montmorillonite Group, their Origin and Relation to Soils and Clays, Geological Survey Professional, paper 205-B, 1st edn. US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 23–79.10.3133/pp205B ↗
24. 10.1016/j.clay.2008.11.00710.1016/j.clay.2008.11.007 ↗
25. 10.1017/S088571560001240910.1017/S0885715600012409 ↗
26. Thorstensen R · Materials and Structures · 2014 · 48 · 397910.1617/s11527-014-0457-6 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.064 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.00110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.001 ↗