The effect of prehydration on the engineering properties of CEM I Portland cement
Source abstract
Abstract
Prehydration – the reaction between anhydrous cement and water vapour – has deleterious effects on engineering properties such as compressive strength, workability and setting time. This study assessed changes in the engineering properties of CEM I Portland cement exposed to relative humidities (RHs) of 60% or 85% for 7 and 28 days. Thin layers (no more than 2 mm thick) of CEM I 42.5R cement were exposed to controlled RHs of 60% and 85%, followed by assessment of compressive strength, setting time and workability. These measurements were complemented by characterising the prehydrated anhydrous cement using isothermal calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and thermal gravimetric analysis. Following prehydration at 60% RH, conventional hydration resulted in a negligible reduction in strength development plus a decrease in workability and increase in setting time. At 85% RH, compressive strength was greatly reduced, particularly at early ages. There was also a greater loss of workability and increase in setting time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Properties and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
PhD Student, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
PhD Student, Chair for Construction Chemicals, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
Masters Student, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Technician, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Professor, Chair for Construction Chemicals, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.015 ↗
2. 10.1039/b509904h10.1039/b509904h ↗
3. BSI · 1978
4. BSI · 1978
5. BSI · 1978
6. BSI · 1998
7. BSI · 2011
8. 10.1680/pc.3611610.1680/pc.36116 ↗
9. Dubina E · Advances in Applied Ceramics · 2010 · 109 · 26010.1179/174367509X12554402491029 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.07.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2011.07.009 ↗
11. Dubina E · Alitinform · 2011 · 3 · 38
12. 10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00369-X10.1016/S0040-6031(99)00369-X ↗
13. 10.1016/S0008-8846(96)85029-010.1016/S0008-8846(96)85029-0 ↗
14. Havard Mork J · ACI Materials Journal · 1997 · 94 · 142
15. Hewlett P · 2004
16. Janotka I · Ceramic-Silikaty · 2001 · 45 · 16
17. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00132-510.1016/S0008-8846(99)00132-5 ↗
18. 10.1016/0040-6031(86)85139-510.1016/0040-6031(86)85139-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/B978-081551437-4.50004-710.1016/B978-081551437-4.50004-7 ↗
20. Richartz VW · ZKG International · 1973 · 26 · 67
21. Schmidt G · ZKG International · 2007 · 60 · 94
22. Sprung S · ZKG International · 1978 · 30 · 305
23. 10.1680/cc.2592910.1680/cc.25929 ↗
24. Theisen K · American Ceramic Society Bulletin · 1975 · 54 · 787
25. Winnefeld F · ZKG International · 2008 · 61 · 68
26. Winston PW · Ecological Society of America · 1960 · 41 · 232