journal article·2016-03

Preparation and properties of modified magnesium oxysulfate cement derived from waste sulfuric acid

Wu Chengyou, Zhang Huifang, Yu Hongfa

Advances in Cement Research· Volume 28· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

High-strength modified magnesium oxysulfate cement is prepared using light-burned magnesia and industrial waste sulfuric acid resulting from titanium dioxide production. Amino trimethylene phosphonic acid (ATMP) is used as a modifier. Coal fly ash is added as a filler to the magnesium oxysulfate cement in order to further reduce its production cost. The compressive strength, setting time, phase compositions, micro-morphology and volume stability of the modified magnesium oxysulfate cement are comprehensively analysed. The results indicate that the compressive strength of the modified magnesium oxysulfate cement reaches 82·1 MPa when the molar ratio of the active magnesium oxide/sulfuric acid (MgO/H2SO4) (M) is 6, the water/cement ratio (R) is 0·6 and the ATMP and coal fly ash dosages are 0·2% and 50%, respectively. Low ATMP doses markedly affect the microstructure, hydration and shrinkage of the magnesium oxysulfate cement. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses prove that the needle-like magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate – 5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·7H2O crystal (5·1·7 phase) – is the predominant strength phase in this cement system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Qinghai University, Xining, People's Republic of China (Corresponding author: )

Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, People's Republic of China

Qinghai University, Xining, People's Republic of China

Department of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0008-8846(78)90063-710.1016/0008-8846(78)90063-7 ↗
2. Chen DB (2009) Practical Questions and Answers of Production of Titanium Dioxide with Sulfuric Acid. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, China, pp. 21–36 (in Chinese).
3. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.01910.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.10.019 ↗
4. Daspoddar K · Journal of the Indian Chemical Society · 1992 · 69 · 550
5. 10.1071/CH955021510.1071/CH9550215 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00043-710.1016/S0008-8846(03)00043-7 ↗
7. Dong JM · Journal of Salt Lake Research · 2010 · 18 · 38
8. Fa H · Paint and Coatings Industry · 1999 · 30
9. Hu SG · Cement · 2005 · 6
10. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.00510.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.005 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.02110.1016/j.seppur.2011.10.021 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.03.01510.1016/j.cemconres.2007.03.015 ↗
13. Liu H · Phosphate and Compound Fertilizer · 2002 · 17 · 34
14. 10.1007/s12034-007-0043-410.1007/s12034-007-0043-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0304-386X(96)00029-110.1016/S0304-386X(96)00029-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.04310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.043 ↗
17. 10.1021/cg070442n10.1021/cg070442n ↗
18. 10.1111/jace.1255610.1111/jace.12556 ↗
19. 10.1021/ie201652p10.1021/ie201652p ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.13410.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.134 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.04310.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.043 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10757.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10757.x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.01710.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.017 ↗
24. 10.1002/978352761668810.1002/9783527616688 ↗
25. Wen J · Concrete · 2011 · 49
26. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.174-177.102610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.174-177.1026 ↗
27. 10.1617/s11527-013-0202-610.1617/s11527-013-0202-6 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.07.01510.1016/j.seppur.2009.07.015 ↗
29. Xu TW · Journal of Membrane Science · 2001 · 183 · 19310.1016/S0376-7388(00)00590-1 ↗
30. Yu HF · Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society · 2000 · 28 · 33
31. Zhang HJ · Environmental Pollution and Control · 2000 · 22 · 22