Fly ash–limestone ternary cements: effect of component fineness
Source abstract
Abstract
Composite cements in which the ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is partly replaced by limestone powder and/or siliceous fly ash (FA) at levels up to 35% were studied using three different finenesses for each material. The aim was to evaluate the influence of fineness and replacement level on the development of the compressive strength, the amount of bound water and calcium hydroxide and the heat of hydration of the composite cements. Replacing up to 10% of the fine OPC by fine limestone powder did not impair the compressive strength. Using 5% fine limestone powder instead of 5% fine FA in a cement containing 35% FA resulted, on the other hand, in a considerable strength increase of 13% at 28 days, indicating a synergetic effect between limestone powder and fly ash. The OPC fineness was the major parameter regarding the early hydration. At 28 days the fineness of the fly ash also played an important role due to its contribution to the pozzolanic reaction. Indeed, intensive grinding of the fly ash appeared to render the fly ash more reactive. The fineness of the limestone powder within the tested range (362–812 m2/kg) had no effect on the hydration of the OPC and the composite cement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Researcher, SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, Trondheim, Norway
Retired Professor at NTNU, Department of Structural Engineering, Trondheim, Norway
Adjunct Professor NTNU, Department of Structural Engineering, Norcem AS, Heidelberg Cement Group, Brevik, Norway
Adjunct Professor NTNU, Department of Anorganic Chemistry, SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, Trondheim, Norway
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.07.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2010.07.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00201-410.1016/S0008-8846(98)00201-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00217-910.1016/S0008-8846(00)00217-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00491-410.1016/S0008-8846(01)00491-4 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01087-610.1016/S0008-8846(02)01087-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00194-410.1016/S0008-8846(97)00194-4 ↗
7. De Weerdt K · 2008 · 107
8. De Weerdt K · 257
9. 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00116-110.1016/S0008-8846(98)00116-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0956-053X(96)00063-310.1016/S0956-053X(96)00063-3 ↗
11. Fredvik TI · 2005
12. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90056-910.1016/0008-8846(76)90056-9 ↗
13. 10.3151/jact.4.35710.3151/jact.4.357 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mineng.2004.06.03110.1016/j.mineng.2004.06.031 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00292-110.1016/S0008-8846(00)00292-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00016-610.1016/S0958-9465(01)00016-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.06.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2007.06.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/0008-8846(91)90183-I10.1016/0008-8846(91)90183-I ↗
19. 10.1007/978-94-015-8646-7_710.1007/978-94-015-8646-7_7 ↗
20. Locher FW · 2005
21. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.002 ↗
22. Malhotra VM · 2002
23. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00141-X10.1016/0008-8846(95)00141-X ↗
25. 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00020-110.1016/S0958-9465(98)00020-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/0040-6031(88)87515-410.1016/0040-6031(88)87515-4 ↗
27. 10.1680/adcr.1989.2.8.14710.1680/adcr.1989.2.8.147 ↗
28. Schiessl P · 1989 · 297
29. Schiller B · ZKG International · 1992 · 45 · 325
30. 10.1016/j.minpro.2004.07.02210.1016/j.minpro.2004.07.022 ↗
31. 10.1016/0008-8846(77)90073-410.1016/0008-8846(77)90073-4 ↗
32. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90099-510.1016/0008-8846(76)90099-5 ↗
33. Standard Norge · 2005
34. 10.1680/cc.2592910.1680/cc.25929 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00031-610.1016/S0958-9465(98)00031-6 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.06.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.06.013 ↗