journal article·2010-11

On kinetics of failure in, and resistance to penetration of metals and ceramics

N K Bourne

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 109· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The performance of armour materials depends upon the deformation mechanisms operating during the penetration process. The critical mechanisms determining the behaviour of armour ceramics have not been isolated using traditional ballistics. It has recently become possible to measure strength histories in materials under shock. The data gained for the failed strength of the armour are shown to relate directly to the penetration measured. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated in one-dimensional strain that the material can be loaded and recovered for post-mortem examination. Failure is by microfracture, which is a function of the defects and then cracking activated by plasticity mechanisms within the grains and failure at grain boundaries in the amorphous intergranular phase. Thus, it appears that the shock induced plastic yielding of grains at the impact face that determines the later time penetration through the tile.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/PROC-538-13910.1557/PROC-538-139 ↗
2. Y. M. Gupta: ‘Shock wave experiments at different length scales: recent achievements and future challenges’, in ‘Shock compression of condensed matter — 1999’, (ed. M. D. Furnish et al.), 3–10; 2000, Melville, NY, American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.1303412 ↗
3. Z. Rosenberg: ‘The dynamic response of ceramics to shock wave loading’, in ‘Shock and impact on structures’, (ed. C. A. Brebbia et al), 73–105; 1994, Southampton, Computational Mechanics Publications.
4. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00046-510.1016/S0022-5096(98)00046-5 ↗
5. 10.1098/rspa.2006.171310.1098/rspa.2006.1713 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00171.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2004.tb00171.x ↗
7. Alekseevskii V. P. · Fiz. Goreniya Vzryra, · 1966 · 2 · 99
8. 10.1016/0022-5096(67)90010-510.1016/0022-5096(67)90010-5 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.32875810.1063/1.328758 ↗
10. Z. Rosenberg: ‘Review of lateral stress measurements with piezoresistive gauges’, in ‘Shock compression of condensed matter — 1999’, (ed. M. D. Furnish et al), 1033–1037; 2000, Melville, NY, American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.1303644 ↗
11. 10.1088/0022-3727/29/9/03510.1088/0022-3727/29/9/035 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.08.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.08.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/0734-743X(90)90021-M10.1016/0734-743X(90)90021-M ↗
14. 10.1016/0734-743X(88)90035-810.1016/0734-743X(88)90035-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00121-910.1016/S0734-743X(99)00121-9 ↗
16. Z. Rosenberg, E. Dekel, V. Hohler, A. J. Stilp and K. Weber: ‘Penetration of tungsten-alloy rods into composite ceramic targets: experiments and 2-D simulations’, in ‘Shock compression of condensed matter — 1997’, (ed. D. P. D. S.C. Schmidt and J.W. Forbes), 917–920; 1998, Woodbury, NY, American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.55612 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.162067910.1063/1.1620679 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10853-009-3394-y10.1007/s10853-009-3394-y ↗
19. 10.1098/rspa.1999.036010.1098/rspa.1999.0360 ↗
20. N. K. Bourne and Z. Rosenberg: ‘The dynamic response of soda-lime glass’, in ‘Shock compression of condensed matter — 1995’, (ed. S. C. Schmidt et al), 567–572; 1996, Woodbury, NY, American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.50660 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.36070910.1063/1.360709 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.278715410.1063/1.2787154 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00015-510.1016/S0167-6636(98)00015-5 ↗
24. 10.1038/nmat168910.1038/nmat1689 ↗