Toughening mechanism and thermal shock resistance of ZrO 2 (3Y)/Fe28at-%Al composites evaluated by indentation techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
AbstractToughening mechanism and thermal shock resistance of monoclinic ZrO2 (3Y) and ZrO2 (3Y)/Fe28at-%Al composites were investigated by indentation techniques. ZrO2 (3Y)/Fe28at-%Al composites exhibited more pronounced R curve behaviour than the monolithic ZrO2 (3Y). Quantitative analysis of toughening behaviour indicated that the enhanced toughness was attributed to the synergistic effect between crack bridging toughening and phase transformation toughening. Thermal shock resistance of as prepared composite was evaluated by indentation–quench method. Compared with monoclinic ZrO2 (3Y), ZrO2 (3Y)/Fe28at-%Al composites had higher critical thermal shock temperature difference ΔTU at which cracks grow unstably. The thermal shock resistance parameters R, R′ and R′′′′ were also calculated to evaluate the thermal shock resistance. It was found that the addition of Fe28at-%Al particles could lead to higher KIC, thermal conductivity and lower Yong’s modulus, thus resulting in higher ΔTU values of ZrO2 (3Y)/Fe28...
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.01.00410.1016/j.ceramint.2011.01.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.01610.1016/j.msea.2009.04.016 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00267-810.1016/S0955-2219(99)00267-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01122-810.1016/S0921-5093(98)01122-8 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00267-810.1016/S0955-2219(99)00267-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0966-9795(02)00009-210.1016/S0966-9795(02)00009-2 ↗
7. 10.1179/1743676111Y.000000007110.1179/1743676111Y.0000000071 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.intermet.2013.04.01310.1016/j.intermet.2013.04.013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.01410.1016/j.intermet.2010.07.014 ↗
10. Bai Y · Mater. Charact. · 2013 · 69
11. 10.1179/1743676113Y.000000012110.1179/1743676113Y.0000000121 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00038.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00038.x ↗
13. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00768-510.1016/S0921-5093(97)00768-5 ↗
14. Xi J and Guan ZD: ‘Investigation on characteristics of R-curve for engineering ceramics. Proceedings of the First China International Conference on High-Performance Ceramics (October, 1998, Beijing)’, 645–648; 1998, Beijing, Tsinghua University Press.
15. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00273-910.1016/S0955-2219(00)00273-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00237-510.1016/S0955-2219(00)00237-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.01910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00192-110.1016/0955-2219(95)00192-1 ↗
19. Li S · Foshan Ceram. · 2007 · 9 · 1
20. Li YQ · J. Nanjing Univ. Chem. Technol. · 1997 · 19 · 42
21. Rice RW: ‘Ceramic fabrication technology’; 2003, New York, Marcel Dekker Inc.
22. Jose FB · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2002 · 85 · 277810.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00528.x ↗
23. 10.1016/0001-6160(86)90052-010.1016/0001-6160(86)90052-0 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11290.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11290.x ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00390.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00390.x ↗
26. 10.1016/0390-5519(78)90028-510.1016/0390-5519(78)90028-5 ↗