Oxidation resistance of magnesia carbon bricks and the influence on their performance
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the oxidation resistance of magnesia carbon bricks with different compositions was evaluated and the influencing factors were obtained, the influence of oxidation resistance on the performance of magnesia carbon bricks was investigated. The test results showed that for low-carbon MgO-C refractories, the influence of holding time was greater than that of oxidation temperature; for medium and high carbon MgO-C refractories, the influence of oxidation temperature was greater than that of holding times. The oxidation resistance of refractories, especially that of low-carbon MgO-C refractories, improved with the increase of the content of metallic additives. The oxidation resistance improved with the increase of graphite purity, especially in the low-temperature region. It is expected that this study can contribute to the optimal selection of magnesia carbon bricks in the trunnion area of furnace lining and provide a reference for the design of refractories with long overall service life.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Baosteel Group Central Research Institute, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
Jinan Ludong Refractories Company, Jinan, People’s Republic of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Landy RA. Magnesia refractories. refractories handbook. C. Schacht, editor. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004. pp. 109–149.10.1201/9780203026328.ch5 ↗
2. 10.17159/2411-9717/1011/202010.17159/2411-9717/1011/2020 ↗
3. Mohamed E. · J Ceram Soc Jpn · 2004 · 112 · 517
4. Carniglia S · 1992 · 135
5. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00863.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00863.x ↗
6. Li X · Can Ceram Q · 1993 · 62 · 197
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.32410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.324 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08423.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08423.x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.16910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.169 ↗
10. Watanabe A · Taikabutsu Overseas · 1987 · 7 · 17
11. Rigaud M. Ceramics: charting the future, 8th CIMTEC, Florence. P. Vincenzini, editor. Florence, Italy: Techna Srl., Faenza, 1995, Vol. 3A, p. 399–414.
12. 10.2355/isijinternational.29.46910.2355/isijinternational.29.469 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02713.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02713.x ↗
14. 10.1016/S0272-8842(02)00049-410.1016/S0272-8842(02)00049-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00308-310.1016/S0955-2219(00)00308-3 ↗
16. Ichikawa K · Taikabutsu Overseas · 1995 · 15 · 21
17. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02276.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02276.x ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01391.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01391.x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2005.03.00810.1016/j.ceramint.2005.03.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0272-8842(02)00049-410.1016/S0272-8842(02)00049-4 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1106088310.3390/ma11060883 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00863.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00863.x ↗
23. 10.1179/09679780068083910.1179/096797800680839 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.01010.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10305710.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103057 ↗
26. 10.12776/ams.v22i3.67710.12776/ams.v22i3.677 ↗