journal article·2012-04

Mechanical properties of glass silicate based composites – effects of varying fibre volume fractions

G Ren, P J Hogg, D H Woolstencraft

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 111· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The general mechanical characteristics of fibre reinforced ceramic silicate composites were investigated in this paper as a function of the volume fraction of reinforcing fibres. It is found that the fibre volume fraction, the fibre/matrix interfacial properties and the microstructures of the composites are all important in determining the strength of the material and their fracture mechanism. This investigation revealed the existence of microcracks and interfacial debonding caused by stress concentration and differential contraction between fibre and matrix during the moulding process, which in turn affected the mechanical properties. This evaluation used chopped fibres (alkali resistant glass fibre) as the reinforcement with fibre volume fraction varied under optimised moulding conditions (temperature and pressure). In addition, a selected matrix formulation was used for the analysis of the microstructural behaviour of the moulded composite while its fracture surface was analysed. The results showed that the composite stress–strain behaviour and the residual stresses associated with moulding could be controlled by the moulding process and volume fractions. This is supported by the results of residual stress simulation and analysis between the fibre/matrix interfaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/174367608X37288010.1179/174367608X372880 ↗
2. Banas RP: ‘Lessons learned from the development and manufacture of ceramic reusable surface insulation (RSI) materials for space shuttle orbiters’, Proc. NASA/LARC Conf. on ‘Shuttle performance lessons learned’, Hampton, VA, USA, March 1983, Langley Research Centre.
3. 10.1007/BF0055015510.1007/BF00550155 ↗
4. Grayson M: ‘Encyclopaedia of glass, ceramics, clay and cement’, new edn, 198–230; 1985, Oxford, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. 10.1007/BF0316352010.1007/BF03163520 ↗
6. Ren G: ‘Fibre reinforced ceramic moulding composites, manufacturing and characterisation’, PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London, UK, 2000.
7. ‘Liquid silicates (079/074) and solid silicates (Crystal M (P60))’, Crosfield Co., Ripon, UK, 1994
8. ‘FABUTIT 320, hardener for sodium silicate bonded masses and mortars’, Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG, Budenheim, Germany, 2000.
9. 10.1007/BF0035683210.1007/BF00356832 ↗
10. Ambroise J, Dejean J, Pera J: ‘Study of fibre matrix interfaces in metakaoline-OPC/blended cement GRC composites’, Proc. Materials Research Society Symp. on ‘Bonding in cementitious composites’, Boston, MA, USA,December 1987, Vol. 114, Materials Research Society, 175–176.10.1557/PROC-114-175 ↗
11. 10.1179/174367508X29784910.1179/174367508X297849 ↗
12. 10.1179/09679780422501873210.1179/096797804225018732 ↗
13. ‘Data sheets of AR glass fibre’, Cem-FIL International Ltd, Lancashire, UK, 1996.
14. 10.1098/rspa.1987.001910.1098/rspa.1987.0019 ↗
15. 10.1163/156856191X0024210.1163/156856191X00242 ↗
16. 10.1163/156856189X0011910.1163/156856189X00119 ↗
17. 10.1016/B978-0-408-22162-7.50006-310.1016/B978-0-408-22162-7.50006-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00432-410.1016/S0045-7949(96)00432-4 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983680020030810.1177/002199836800200308 ↗
20. Brun MK · Adv. Ceram. Mater. · 1988 · 3 · 50610.1111/j.1551-2916.1988.tb00265.x ↗
21. ‘Managing our radioactive waste safely – CoRWM’s recommendations to government’, Final report, Document 700, CoRWM, London, UK, 2006
22. Lee WE · Adv. Appl. Ceram. · 2006 · 105 · 2110.1179/174367606X81687 ↗
23. 10.1179/1743676110Y.000000000810.1179/1743676110Y.0000000008 ↗