Abrupt high grain growth in hydroxyapatite during flash sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
The electric flash generated by an electric field aided the sintering of hydroxyapatite (HA) in relatively less time and at lower furnace temperatures than the conventional sintering method. The current work has reported a comparative study to explain thermodynamically the effects of the increasing DC electric field strength at 1000°C and 1100°C sintering furnace temperatures during flash sintering in terms of the grain growth and densification of the HA in air. The abrupt change in current density and conductivity of HA during the flash peak correlates the high grain growth and rapid densification with increasing electric field strength. The increased electric field strength reduced the power dissipation from the HA. The abrupt high-rise grain growth phenomenon during flash sintering might consist of the thermal effect and enhancement in ionic conductivity due to the application of an electric field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
HudensBio Ltd, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA
International School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
MiraCosta College, Design Department, Oceanside, CA, USA
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C6BM00009F10.1039/C6BM00009F ↗
2. 10.1063/1.512144210.1063/1.5121442 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.07.00810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.07.008 ↗
4. 10.1111/jace.1297210.1111/jace.12972 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03102.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03102.x ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03905.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03905.x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.030 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04089.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04089.x ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1404103110.3390/ma14041031 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.00610.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.006 ↗
11. 10.1080/17436753.2021.196707510.1080/17436753.2021.1967075 ↗
12. 10.1111/jace.1378610.1111/jace.13786 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.b.3353810.1002/jbm.b.33538 ↗
14. Kim D-Y · BioMed Res Int · 2014 · 2014 · 768254
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.10.03110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.10.031 ↗
16. 10.1111/jace.1507110.1111/jace.15071 ↗
17. 10.1088/1367-2630/aadd5a10.1088/1367-2630/aadd5a ↗