journal article·2020-08-17

Preliminary evaluates of silica/β-TCP/PLGA microspheres for dentin regeneration in vivo

Kun Qian, Bingqing Li, Wenhao Zhu, Jingren Zhao, Yihong Liu

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 119· Issue 5-6
Publisher page

Abstract

Silica/β-tri-calcium phosphate/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres, a type of bioactive and biodegradable materials, were produced by a double emulsion and solvent evaporation methods. The biological activity of the microspheres to promote dentin regeneration was investigated in vivo. First, the ionic concentration of silicon in the microspheres was detected by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. The results showed the release of silicon continuously and without any obvious burst. Second, the microspheres with or without human dental pulp cells adhered were transplanted into subcutaneous pockets of nude mice to evaluate the bioactivity. The implanted material specimens were obtained after 6 weeks. The specimens were evaluated after H&E staining and toluidine blue staining. The results presented the cells ingrowth of the scaffold material and collagenous tissues around the microspheres. It was demonstrated that the material had outstanding biocompatibility and bioactivity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of General Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Koike T · Biomed Res Int · 2014 · 1 · 745139
2. 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.017004185.x10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.017004185.x ↗
3. 10.1097/00004770-200404000-0000310.1097/00004770-200404000-00003 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.02310.1016/j.joen.2008.03.023 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joen.2009.02.00910.1016/j.joen.2009.02.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.03910.1016/j.joen.2009.09.039 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.01510.1016/j.joen.2012.09.015 ↗
8. 10.1111/iej.1208710.1111/iej.12087 ↗
9. 10.1038/nbt86410.1038/nbt864 ↗
10. 10.1097/01.don.0000164138.49923.e510.1097/01.don.0000164138.49923.e5 ↗
11. Sharma S · J Clin Diagn Res · 2014 · 8 · 309
12. 10.1039/c3tb21002b10.1039/c3tb21002b ↗
13. 10.1111/etp.1202710.1111/etp.12027 ↗
14. 10.1155/2016/920457410.1155/2016/9204574 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.01910.1016/j.joen.2014.01.019 ↗
16. 10.2217/rme.09.4510.2217/rme.09.45 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10561-015-9503-z10.1007/s10561-015-9503-z ↗
18. 10.1177/002203451453782910.1177/0022034514537829 ↗
19. 10.1890/07012610.1890/070126 ↗
20. Carlisle EM. · 1986 · 123
21. 10.1385/BTER:77:1:2510.1385/BTER:77:1:25 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.167.3916.27910.1126/science.167.3916.279 ↗
23. 10.1038/239333a010.1038/239333a0 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00223-010-9408-610.1007/s00223-010-9408-6 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.05.00410.1016/j.tibtech.2014.05.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.01.01810.1016/j.copbio.2012.01.018 ↗
27. 10.1166/jbt.2018.174010.1166/jbt.2018.1740 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.04.00910.1016/j.tibtech.2006.04.009 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.02510.1016/j.bone.2014.07.025 ↗
30. Haixia L · Biomed Res Int · 2017 · 4 · 1
31. Yoko H · J Oral Maxillofac Res · 2016 · 7 · e2
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.07510.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.075 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.01110.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.011 ↗
34. 10.1016/0003-9969(86)90131-710.1016/0003-9969(86)90131-7 ↗
35. Andujar MB · Development · 1991 · 111 · 69110.1242/dev.111.3.691 ↗
36. 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00669.x10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00669.x ↗
37. 10.1016/0003-9969(90)90023-410.1016/0003-9969(90)90023-4 ↗