journal article·2014-11

Thermodynamic modelling of phase equilibria in cement systems: multiple sublattice model for solids in equilibrium with non-ideal aqueous phase

R. H. Davies, J. A. Gisby, A. Dinsdale, M. Tyrer, C. S. Walker, F. P. Glasser

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 113· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

The thermodynamics of the CaO–SiO2–H2O (C–S–H) gel phase present in cement systems has traditionally been modelled in terms of one or more stoichiometric solid phases. We present a model for the C–S–H gel phase based on non-ideal solution of ions and/or molecular species on a number of sublattices similar to that used extensively in National Physical Laboratory’s MTDATA software for modelling oxides and alloy phases. In application to the C–S–H system, aqueous phase compositions are represented within experimental uncertainties, and measured pH values are predicted exceptionally well although not included in the model parameterisation. Extensions to the base C–S–H model to account for the presence of Al2O3, modelling of the analogous M–S–H phase in MgO containing systems and an application to nuclear waste disposal technology where the portioning of uranium between the gel, aqueous and other phases is calculated, are also discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Radioactive element chemistry and processing · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Atkinson A, Hearne JA and Knights CF: ‘Aqueous and thermodynamic modeling of CaO–SiO 2 –H 2 O gels’, Report no. AERER12548, UK Atomic Energy Authority, Harwell, 1987.
2. Glasser FP · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1987 · 84 · 33110.1557/PROC-84-331 ↗
3. Berner UR · Radiochim. Acta · 1988 · 38710.1524/ract.1988.4445.2.387 ↗
4. 10.1016/0956-053X(92)90050-S10.1016/0956-053X(92)90050-S ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01130.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01130.x ↗
6. 10.1680/adcr.2005.17.2.5710.1680/adcr.2005.17.2.57 ↗
7. Benbow S, Walker C and Savage D: ‘Intercomparison of cement solid-solution models. Issues affecting the geochemical evolution of repositories for radioactive waste’, SKI report no. 29, Stockholm, 2007.
8. Soler JM: ‘Thermodynamic description of the solubility of C–S–H gels in hydrated Portland cement. Literature review’, Posiva working report no. 88, Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, Finland, 2007.
9. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00748-710.1016/S0008-8846(01)00748-7 ↗
10. 10.1021/es950681b10.1021/es950681b ↗
11. 10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00149-X10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00149-X ↗
12. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00092-710.1016/S0008-8846(99)00092-7 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0266576010.1007/BF02665760 ↗
14. Thomas JJ · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1998 · 83 · 60610.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02380.x ↗
15. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)00036-610.1016/S0364-5916(02)00036-6 ↗
16. Hunt C, Nottay J, Brewin A and Dinsdale AT: NPL report no. MATC(A) 83, 2002.
17. Wang J · Z. Metallkd · 2001 · 92 · 299
18. Putman DC · Int. J. Cast Met. Res. · 2003 · 16 · 19110.1080/13640461.2003.11819581 ↗
19. Taskinen P, Dinsdale AT and Gisby JA: ‘Industrial slag chemistry – a case study of computational thermodynamics’, Proc. Symp. on ‘Metal separation technologies III’, Copper Mountain, CO, USA, June 2004, 269–273.
20. Gisby JA, Dinsdale AT, Barton-Jones I, Gibbon A, Taskinen PA and Taylor JR: ‘Phase equilibria in oxide and sulphide systems, in sulfide smelting’, Proc. TMS 2002 131st Annual Meet. & Exhibition, Seattle, WA, USA, February 2002. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Warrendale, USA, 533–546.
21. 10.1007/BF0322328410.1007/BF03223284 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-3115(93)90179-310.1016/0022-3115(93)90179-3 ↗
23. 10.1680/adcr.2000.12.1.1910.1680/adcr.2000.12.1.19 ↗
24. SGTE: ‘SGTE substance database, thermodynamic properties of inorganic materials’, ‘Landolt–Börnstein group IV (physical chemistry)’, Vol. 19; 1999, Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer.
25. 10.1021/j100638a00910.1021/j100638a009 ↗
26. Weare JH · Rev. Mineral · 1987 · 17 · 143
27. 10.1016/j.calphad.2012.06.00810.1016/j.calphad.2012.06.008 ↗
28. 10.6028/jres.012.06010.6028/jres.012.060 ↗
29. 10.1021/j100885a02710.1021/j100885a027 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06192.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06192.x ↗
31. 10.1016/S1065-7355(96)90046-210.1016/S1065-7355(96)90046-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.03410.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.034 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.12.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2006.12.002 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja01860a00110.1021/ja01860a001 ↗
35. 10.1039/jr950000368210.1039/jr9500003682 ↗
36. Kalousek G: ‘Application of differential thermal analysis in a study of the system lime–silica–water’, Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on ‘The chemistry of cement’, 1952, Cement and Concrete Association, London, UK, 296–311.
37. 10.1039/dt981000064510.1039/dt9810000645 ↗
38. Guillaumont R et al . ‘Update on the chemical thermodynamics of uranium, neptunium, plutonium, americium and technetium’, Vol. 5; 2003, OECD Nuclear Energ Agency, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Amsterdam.
39. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.04610.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.046 ↗
40. 10.1016/0956-053X(95)00022-R10.1016/0956-053X(95)00022-R ↗