Ceramic tiles as sustainable, functional and insulating materials to mitigate fire damage
Source abstract
Abstract
Owing to their lower costs and functional properties, the construction industry has been increasingly adopting synthetic organic polymer (SOP) materials into linings, interiors and non-load bearing structural components. While SOPs have favourable properties and characteristics at ambient conditions, the same materials often perform poorly under moderate-to-elevated temperatures such as that arising from a building fire. In fact, most SOPs tend to combust and decompose at elevated temperatures which, unlike traditional building materials such as concrete and ceramic tiles, is proven to not only contribute to the fire but also to adversely affect evacuation and firefighting operations. From a fire engineering perspective, this paper tests a hypothesis in which ceramic tiles (CTs) are expected to outperform SOPs and commonly used insulations as finishing and lining materials under fire conditions. As such, this study showcases a thorough comparison between the behaviour of commonly available CTs, SOPs and insulations in temperatures ranging between 25 and 1000°C. Then, this paper analyses published CT models to derive temperature-dependent material models with the aid of machine learning (ML). Findings of this work advocate the use of CTs as favourable finishing and interior lining materials to enable realising improved structural fire performance and fire response managements, as opposed to SOPs, composites or insulations. The outcome of this work is expected to be of interest to architects, first responders, building officials, fire and structural engineers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire effects on concrete materials · Fire dynamics and safety research · Engineering and Material Science Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Glenn Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
AI Research Institute for Science and Engineering (AIRISE), Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
Tile Council of North America, Anderson, SC, USA
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1108/prr-12-2018-003310.1108/prr-12-2018-0033 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.18210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.182 ↗
3. 2005
4. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_910.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_9 ↗
5. 10.1155/2014/46851010.1155/2014/468510 ↗
6. 10.1533/978084569999410.1533/9780845699994 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10458410.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104584 ↗
8. 10.1016/b978-0-08-102501-7.00002-310.1016/b978-0-08-102501-7.00002-3 ↗
9. NTSB, Fire damage to bridge and subsequent collapse, Atlanta, Georgia, March 30, 2017, 2017 [cited 2019 June 27]. Available from: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAB1802.pdf
10. 10.1136/bmj.j296610.1136/bmj.j2966 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.07710.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.077 ↗
12. 10.1136/thorax-2019-btsabstracts2019.31610.1136/thorax-2019-btsabstracts2019.316 ↗
13. Hamedi M, Eshragh S, Franz M, et al. Analyzing Impact of I-85 Bridge Collapse on Regional Travel in Atlanta, (2018) [cited 2019 June 27]. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/view/1496279
14. IBC, International Building Code, 2018. Available from: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2018?site_type=public
15. 10.1007/s10973-018-7127-910.1007/s10973-018-7127-9 ↗
16. 10.1520/E0084-14.210.1520/E0084-14.2 ↗
17. 10.1520/E0648-15E01.flame10.1520/E0648-15E01.flame ↗
18. 10.1520/mnl10913m10.1520/mnl10913m ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0104021610.1007/BF01040216 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12647-018-0254-810.1007/s12647-018-0254-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2018.12.05510.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2018.12.055 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10694-011-0247-410.1007/s10694-011-0247-4 ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0199839010.1007/BF01998390 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.02210.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.022 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10694-016-0570-x10.1007/s10694-016-0570-x ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0230305310.1007/BF02303053 ↗
27. 10.1520/E2652-12.1.410.1520/E2652-12.1.4 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.clay.2011.04.01710.1016/j.clay.2011.04.017 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.clay.2009.08.01610.1016/j.clay.2009.08.016 ↗
30. 10.13168/cs.2016.000110.13168/cs.2016.0001 ↗
31. 10.1364/AO.54.00992510.1364/AO.54.009925 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1211187010.3390/ma12111870 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.499448110.1063/1.4994481 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.09.03110.1016/j.ceramint.2011.09.031 ↗
35. 10.2298/TSCI130911077K10.2298/TSCI130911077K ↗
36. 10.2109/jcersj2.123.87410.2109/jcersj2.123.874 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2006.01.00310.1016/j.ceramint.2006.01.003 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.22010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.220 ↗
39. 10.1007/s12034-010-0045-510.1007/s12034-010-0045-5 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.04.03810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.04.038 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00341-810.1016/S0924-0136(03)00341-8 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.clay.2015.02.01910.1016/j.clay.2015.02.019 ↗
43. 10.1177/00219983810150050310.1177/002199838101500503 ↗
44. 10.1016/J.FIRESAF.2013.09.01110.1016/J.FIRESAF.2013.09.011 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.08410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.084 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.04.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.04.006 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11431-012-4966-710.1007/s11431-012-4966-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.03210.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.032 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.04.00710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.04.007 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.01210.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.012 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.05.00210.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.05.002 ↗
52. 10.1361/10599490177034491710.1361/105994901770344917 ↗
53. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01704.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01704.x ↗
54. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.08.07410.1016/j.materresbull.2012.08.074 ↗
55. 10.1016/0022-3115(90)90397-610.1016/0022-3115(90)90397-6 ↗
56. 10.3390/ma1102027910.3390/ma11020279 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.19610.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.196 ↗
58. 10.1111/jace.1295010.1111/jace.12950 ↗
59. 10.1007/s11665-015-1621-z10.1007/s11665-015-1621-z ↗
60. 10.3390/app811218310.3390/app8112183 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.151773810.1063/1.1517738 ↗
62. 10.1198/tech.2007.s51810.1198/tech.2007.s518 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.001 ↗
64. The Mathworks Inc. MATLAB – MathWorks, Www.Mathworks.Com/Products/Matlab. 2017. DOI:2016-11-26.
65. 10.1016/J.AUTCON.2019.10291610.1016/J.AUTCON.2019.102916 ↗
66. 10.1016/J.ULTRAS.2008.05.00110.1016/J.ULTRAS.2008.05.001 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.07.00610.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.07.006 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.054 ↗
69. GPTIPS, GPTIPS: genetic programming and symbolic regression for MATLAB, (2010) [cited 2019 January 22]. Available from: http://gptips.sourceforge.net/
70. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.09.18610.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.09.186 ↗
71. Naser MZ, Alavi A. Insights into performance fitness and error metrics for machine learning, 2020 [cited August 4, 2020]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.00887
72. Smith G. · 1986
73. Frank I · 1994
74. 10.1007/bf0104021710.1007/bf01040217 ↗
75. 10.1002/fam.88010.1002/fam.880 ↗
76. Kodur V · 2020
77. 10.1016/0040-6090(82)90019-010.1016/0040-6090(82)90019-0 ↗
78. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06115.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06115.x ↗
79. 10.1609/aimag.v36i4.257710.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577 ↗
80. 10.17559/tv-2015022321565710.17559/tv-20150223215657 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.09210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.092 ↗
82. 10.1007/s10694-020-01069-810.1007/s10694-020-01069-8 ↗