journal article·2022-04-03

Fitness of self-glazed zirconia onlays using conventional and digital impressions

Kun Qian, Bingqing Li, Tingting Pu, Tianyi Bai, Yihong Liu

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 121· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The fitness of self-glazed zirconia (SGZ) onlays fabricated with computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing was analysed, and conventional impressions (CIs) were compared with intraoral digital impressions (DIs). Onlay preparation was applied on a typodont left mandibular first molar to create 22 copy dies, which were divided into DI and CI groups. The marginal gap of DI-fabricated onlays was smaller than that of CI-fabricated onlays (p < 0.05). In both groups, the marginal gap was larger in the distal gingival than in other regions (p < 0.05), and a trend of decreasing marginal accuracy after thermal cycling was observed. SGZ onlays performed well for internal fitness; the overall internal gaps were 72.05 ± 8.16 and 100.96 ± 22.53 μm in Groups DI and CI, respectively. SGZ onlays exhibited clinically acceptable marginal and internal fitness values. The marginal adaptation of DI-fabricated onlays was better than that of CI-fabricated onlays.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of General Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Dental Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.00810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008 ↗
3. 10.1080/17436753.2020.173262310.1080/17436753.2020.1732623 ↗
4. Ferro KJ · J Prosthet Dent · 2017 · 117 · C1, e1–e105
5. Merrill TC · Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent · 2021 · 29 · 119
6. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.00610.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.006 ↗
7. Larson TD. · Northwest Dent · 2012 · 91 · 22
8. 10.1111/joor.1269510.1111/joor.12695 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.00810.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.00810.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.008 ↗
11. 10.1111/jopr.1252110.1111/jopr.12521 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x ↗
13. 10.1007/s00784-015-1626-x10.1007/s00784-015-1626-x ↗
14. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.00210.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.002 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma807394510.3390/ma8073945 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.01710.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017 ↗
18. 10.1111/cid.1212410.1111/cid.12124 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00784-012-0864-410.1007/s00784-012-0864-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.01510.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.00710.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.05.00610.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.05.006 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00416.x10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00416.x ↗
24. 10.1080/17436753.2020.177421910.1080/17436753.2020.1774219 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x ↗
27. 10.1155/2018/515270310.1155/2018/5152703 ↗
28. 10.11607/ijp.567810.11607/ijp.5678 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.00610.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.006 ↗
30. Sailer I · Int J Prosthodont · 2007 · 20 · 383
31. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.00210.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002 ↗
32. 10.1067/mpr.2000.11025810.1067/mpr.2000.110258 ↗
33. Revilla-León M · Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent · 2018 · 26 · 31
34. 10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70043-610.1016/S0022-3913(00)70043-6 ↗
35. 10.1590/S1678-7757201200050001610.1590/S1678-77572012000500016 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00784-015-1504-610.1007/s00784-015-1504-6 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00784-012-0795-010.1007/s00784-012-0795-0 ↗
38. 10.1590/1678-77572015026610.1590/1678-775720150266 ↗
39. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00078.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00078.x ↗
40. 10.1080/23337931.2017.140193310.1080/23337931.2017.1401933 ↗
41. 10.11607/jomi.207010.11607/jomi.2070 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.10010.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100 ↗
43. Nalcai A · Quintessence Int · 2007 · 38 · 433
44. 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90079-R10.1016/0109-5641(92)90079-R ↗
45. Raskin A · J Adhes Dent · 2001 · 3 · 295
46. 10.1038/sj.bdj.481303610.1038/sj.bdj.4813036 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80337-310.1016/S0022-3913(05)80337-3 ↗
48. 10.1007/s00784005006410.1007/s007840050064 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00059-110.1016/S0300-5712(98)00059-1 ↗
50. 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90048-U10.1016/0300-5712(93)90048-U ↗
51. 10.2341/16-093-L10.2341/16-093-L ↗
52. 10.2147/CCIDE.S4201610.2147/CCIDE.S42016 ↗