journal article·2020-01-02

Thermal shock resistance of porous ZrB 2 –SiC ceramic after oxidation

Xinxin Jin, Le Chen, Limin Dong, Peng Zhou, Huanyan Xu, Liguo Jin, Lizhu Liu, Baoxia Ma, Baosheng Xu

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 119· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Thermal shock water quenching tests on porous ZrB2–SiC (ZS) ceramics with 8.7, 17.9 and 27.3% porosity were conducted after these specimens were oxidised in static air at a constant temperature of 1200°C for 30 min. The effect of oxidation on their thermal shock resistance was investigated in detail. The oxidation improved the material’s thermal shock fracture resistance, but reduced their thermal shock damage resistance (TSDR). The thermal shock critical temperature difference (ΔTc) of the oxidised porous ZS ceramics decreased as the porosity increased, which was the opposite trend to that observed in the case of unoxidised porous ZS ceramics. ZS ceramics with higher porosity had higher TSDR with or without oxidation treatment. Thickness of the oxidation layer, degree of oxide layer coverage and internal oxidation were observed to affect the thermal shock behaviour of the porous ZS ceramics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Material Science and Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, People’s Republic of China

Key Laboratory of Engineering Dielectrics and Its Application, Ministry of Education, Harbin University of Science and Technology Harbin, People’s Republic of China

Institute of Intelligent Manufacturing Technology, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Saggio-Woyansky J · Am Ceram Soc Bull · 1992 · 71 · 1674
2. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x ↗
3. 10.1023/A:102267860616010.1023/A:1022678606160 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00418.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00418.x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.09.00310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.09.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.09.04610.1016/j.msea.2013.09.046 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.16410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.164 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.11010.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.110 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.008 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.12510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.125 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.04410.1016/j.msea.2012.03.044 ↗
12. Becher PF · Am Ceram Soc Bull · 1980 · 59 · 542
13. 10.1002/mawe.1985016010510.1002/mawe.19850160105 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02760.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02760.x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.06.02510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.06.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.08.00210.1016/j.corsci.2013.08.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.01.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.01.021 ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00834.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00834.x ↗