journal article·2019-02-17Open access

Zirconia ceramic fixed partial dentures after cyclic fatigue tests and clinical evaluation: a systematic review

Sonja Zarkovic Gjurin, Mutlu Özcan, Cedomir Oblak

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 118· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Zirconia fixed prosthetic dentures are extensively used for replacing missing teeth. The primary objective of this systematic review was to gather and present the results of all in vitro studies and clinical trials conducted on zirconia fixed prosthetic dentures. This review concentrated exclusively on bilayered zirconia and monolithic fixed prosthetic dentures. As such this paper can act as a guideline for more comparable future experimental work on zirconia ceramics. Future studies must use a more systematic approach such as the uniform use of abutment material, material for simulating periodontal support, data about fracture strength before and after fatigue, number of cycles, information about position and size of the indenter. The new digital techniques with long-term follow-up are desirable in further clinical studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Scientific and Engineering Research Topics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/jopr.1256610.1111/jopr.12566 ↗
2. 10.1111/jopr.1205910.1111/jopr.12059 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01299.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01299.x ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.01210.1016/j.actbio.2008.04.012 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10856-014-5217-110.1007/s10856-014-5217-1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.01310.1016/j.dental.2004.07.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394619-5.00013-410.1016/B978-0-12-394619-5.00013-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.02410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.024 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.04810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.048 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.02210.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.022 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.02410.1016/j.dental.2005.04.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.01110.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.00110.1016/j.dental.2011.09.001 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01770.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01770.x ↗
15. Att W · J Oral Rehabil · 2007 · 14 · 283
16. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00551.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00551.x ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00640.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00640.x ↗
18. 10.1007/s00784-010-0469-810.1007/s00784-010-0469-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.01010.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.010 ↗
20. Mahmood D · Swed Dent J · 2013 · 37 · 179
21. 10.11607/prd.252410.11607/prd.2524 ↗
22. Vult von Steyern P. · Swed Dent J Suppl · 2005 · 173 · 1
23. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.01010.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010 ↗
24. Sailer I · Int J Prosthodont · 2007 · 20 · 383
25. Tinschert J · Int J Prosthodont · 2008 · 21 · 217
26. Molin MK · Int J Prosthodont · 2008 · 21 · 223
27. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.93710.1038/sj.bdj.2008.937 ↗
28. Edelhoff D · Quintessence Int · 2008 · 39 · 459
29. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01969.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01969.x ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00693.x10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00693.x ↗
31. Sailer I · Int J Prosthodont · 2009 · 22 · 553
32. Schmitt J · Int J Prosthodont · 2009 · 22 · 597
33. 10.1007/s00784-009-0249-510.1007/s00784-009-0249-5 ↗
34. Roediger M · Int J Prosthodont · 2010 · 23 · 141
35. Sax C · Int J Comput Dent · 2011 · 14 · 183
36. Lops D · Int J Prosthodont · 2012 · 25 · 21
37. Salido MP · Int J Prosthodont · 2012 · 25 · 403
38. 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60094-810.1016/S0022-3913(12)60094-8 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00784-011-0575-210.1007/s00784-011-0575-2 ↗
40. Schmitt J · Int J Prosthodont · 2012 · 25 · 585
41. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.00710.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.007 ↗
42. 10.11607/ijp.322910.11607/ijp.3229 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.00910.1016/j.dental.2014.11.009 ↗
44. 10.11607/ijp.402310.11607/ijp.4023 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.01310.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.013 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.01510.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.015 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.01410.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.014 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.02610.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.026 ↗
49. 10.1155/2017/961830610.1155/2017/9618306 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.00110.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.001 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.00110.1016/j.conctc.2016.06.001 ↗
52. Tinschert J · Int J Prosthodont · 2001 · 14 · 231
53. Rosentritt M · Int J Prosthodont · 2011 · 24 · 465
54. 10.2334/josnusd.52.53110.2334/josnusd.52.531 ↗
55. 10.2209/tdcpublication.54.14910.2209/tdcpublication.54.149 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.03310.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.033 ↗
57. 10.11607/ijp.450410.11607/ijp.4504 ↗
58. Quinn GD. · 2016