Influence of different surface treatments on zirconia/resin shear bond strength using one-bottle universal adhesive
Source abstract
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different treatments on the zirconia/resin shear bond strength (SBS) using commercial one-bottle universal adhesive. Zirconia discs with different surface treatments (blank control; airborne-particle-abrasion; glazing) were bonded to the bovine enamel surfaces using one-bottle universal adhesive. All specimens were tested for SBS (MPa) before and after 10000 thermocycles. Statistically analysis were conducted by using one-way analysis of variance and multiple-comparison least significant difference tests (α = 0.05). Airborne-particle-abrasion group showed higher SBS (36.19 ± 11.86) than control group (14.98 ± 5.90) and glazing group (10.63 ± 5.39) (p < 0.05). After thermocycling test, the SBS significantly decreased for control group (8.84 ± 2.55) and glazing group (6.18 ± 2.78) while not for airborne-particle-abrasion group (41.5 ± 7.95). One-bottle universal adhesives combined with airborne-particle-abrasion showed quite high SBS of zirconia/resin, which was appropriate for bonding of zirconia restoration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Department of General dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-610.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.02210.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022 ↗
3. 10.1080/23337931.2017.130965810.1080/23337931.2017.1309658 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.01410.1016/j.dental.2015.12.014 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.02310.1016/j.dental.2012.04.023 ↗
6. Burke FJ · J Adhes Dent · 2002 · 4 · 7
7. 10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.21410.4047/jap.2015.7.3.214 ↗
8. 10.1002/jbm.b.3301310.1002/jbm.b.33013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.01710.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.017 ↗
10. 10.2341/05-2210.2341/05-22 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.01310.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.013 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60123-110.1016/S0022-3913(07)60123-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.01310.1016/j.dental.2010.03.013 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.00810.1016/j.dental.2009.08.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.02110.1016/j.dental.2016.03.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.01010.1016/j.prosdent.2005.12.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.00510.1016/j.dental.2005.02.005 ↗
18. 10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.26710.4047/jap.2016.8.4.267 ↗
19. Elsaka SE. · J Adhes Dent · 2016 · 18 · 387
20. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.04510.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.045 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.02710.1016/j.dental.2017.04.027 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.00610.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.006 ↗
23. 10.1002/jbm.b.3009710.1002/jbm.b.30097 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.00710.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.007 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-610.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-6 ↗
26. Chougule KJ · J Clin Diagn Res · 2017 · 11 · 20
27. 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.00310.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.04810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.048 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.00510.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.005 ↗
30. Barragan G · Oral Health Dent Manag · 2014 · 13 · 155
31. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.01510.1016/j.msec.2013.09.015 ↗
32. 10.2341/16-156-L10.2341/16-156-L ↗