Study of the electrophoretic deposition copper–carbon nanotubes composite coatings in deep eutectic solvent using a Taguchi experimental design approach
Source abstract
Abstract
The present work discusses the electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of copper–carbon nanotubes (Cu–CNTs) composite coatings in a Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES) media, using a non-symmetric deposition process. A Taguchi experimental design is implemented in order to assess the effect of the different parameters on the microstructural characteristics of the coatings. The analysis of the design of experiments (DOE) is performed with the signal to noise (S/N) ratio and the analysis of variance. The results clearly reveal that the time of deposition is the most influential parameter on crystallite size, whereas the asymmetric factor has the highest effect on the preferential deposition of Cu or C and thus on the chemical composition. It is therefore concluded that by changing some of the parameters, EPD can be implemented to develop nanostructured composite coating having a desired crystallite size and morphology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ingeniería Mecatrónica, Universidad Politécnica de Victoria, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México
Sustentabilidad de los Recursos Naturales y Energía, Cinvestav Unidad Saltillo, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, México
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/9780470277270.ch2010.1002/9780470277270.ch20 ↗
2. 10.1002/pssa.20056618810.1002/pssa.200566188 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.01410.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.014 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.04.08610.1016/j.matlet.2007.04.086 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.20910.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.209 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.05.01710.1016/j.hydromet.2009.05.017 ↗
7. 10.1039/c0ee00470g10.1039/c0ee00470g ↗
8. 10.1016/j.snb.2007.06.01010.1016/j.snb.2007.06.010 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.bios.2013.02.03210.1016/j.bios.2013.02.032 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.aca.2004.03.07510.1016/j.aca.2004.03.075 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja048266j10.1021/ja048266j ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.01310.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.013 ↗
13. 10.1039/b817881j10.1039/b817881j ↗
14. 10.1080/00202967.2016.114844210.1080/00202967.2016.1148442 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11771-012-1372-z10.1007/s11771-012-1372-z ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.03.00410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.03.004 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00080-310.1016/S1359-0286(02)00080-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.03.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.03.016 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01939.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01939.x ↗
21. 10.1007/s10854-010-0079-x10.1007/s10854-010-0079-x ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.05410.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.054 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.412.8310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.412.83 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.09610.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.096 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.bej.2005.01.01910.1016/j.bej.2005.01.019 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.06510.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.065 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.06.00210.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.06.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.18710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.187 ↗
29. 10.1039/C5RA25618F10.1039/C5RA25618F ↗
30. 10.1088/2043-6262/4/1/01501210.1088/2043-6262/4/1/015012 ↗
31. 10.1016/0257-8972(86)90044-710.1016/0257-8972(86)90044-7 ↗