journal article·2012-05

Influence of magnesia doping on structure and electrical conductivity of pyrochlore type GdSmZr 2 O 7

Z-G Liu, J-H Ouyang, K-N Sun, Y Zhou

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 111· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Polycrystalline ceramic samples of magnesia doped GdSm1–xMgxZr2O7–x/2 have been prepared by conventional solid state reaction method using high purity oxides. The influence of magnesia dopant content on densification, microstructure and electrical properties of GdSm1–xMgxZr2O7–x/2 ceramics are investigated. Magnesia doping promotes the sintering densification behaviour of GdSm1–xMgxZr2O7–x/2 ceramics. GdSm1–xMgxZr2O7–x/2 (x = 0, 0·05, 0·10) ceramics have a single phase of the pyrochlore type structure, while GdSm1–xMgxZr2O7–x/2 (x = 0·15, 0·20) ceramics consist of the pyrochlore type structure and a small amount of magnesia as the second phase. The total conductivity of GdSm1–xMgxZr2O7–x/2 ceramics obeys the Arrhenius relation, and gradually increases with increasing temperature from 723 to 1173 K. GdSm1–xMgxZr2O7–x/2 ceramics are oxide-ion conductors in the oxygen partial pressure range of 1·0×10–4 to 1·0 atm at each test temperature. The maximum value of the total conductivity is 1·29×10–2 S cm–1 at 1173 K for the GdSm0·85Mg0·15Zr2O6·925 ceramic.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/b915141a10.1039/b915141a ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.04210.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.042 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.03510.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.035 ↗
4. 10.1002/fuce.20080011010.1002/fuce.200800110 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat104010.1038/nmat1040 ↗
6. 10.1088/1468-6996/11/4/04430110.1088/1468-6996/11/4/044301 ↗
7. 10.1002/fuce.20080012910.1002/fuce.200800129 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.348156210.1149/1.3481562 ↗
9. 10.1002/fuce.20090020610.1002/fuce.200900206 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.11.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.11.009 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.10410.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.104 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.05.06410.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.05.064 ↗
13. 10.1016/0079-6786(83)90001-810.1016/0079-6786(83)90001-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.03.02510.1016/j.cattod.2009.03.025 ↗
15. 10.1179/174367609X42222510.1179/174367609X422225 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.20310.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.203 ↗
17. 10.1002/pssa.221058011410.1002/pssa.2210580114 ↗
18. 10.1016/0167-2738(81)90306-410.1016/0167-2738(81)90306-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.02.01710.1016/j.electacta.2009.02.017 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.03210.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.00510.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.005 ↗
22. Macdonald JR, Johnson WB: in ‘Impedance spectroscopy: theory, experiment and applications’, (ed. E. Barsoukov and J. R. Macdonald), 2nd edn, Chap. 1; 2005, Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.05.07110.1016/j.electacta.2007.05.071 ↗
24. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.09165110.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091651 ↗
25. 10.1021/cm902687z10.1021/cm902687z ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.06.01510.1016/j.ssi.2004.06.015 ↗