Forest Products Industry in a Digital Age: A Look at E-Commerce and Social Media
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The business of marketing, promotions in particular, has changed substantially during the past decade. Physical means of promotion (e.g., newspapers, magazines, radio, billboards) have seen a decline, and the use of social media as a marketing tool has increased significantly. While a number of studies regarding the use of social media among Fortune 500 companies have been conducted, very limited information is available regarding social media use in the US forest products industry. This article presents part one of a two-part series and addresses the first three of the following five objectives: (1) identify the type(s) of e-commerce and social media tools forest products companies use, (2) identify and describe the reasons a company chooses to use or not use social media as a marketing tool, (3) identify and describe perceptions held about social media as a marketing tool, (4) examine factors affecting the use of social media marketing in the forest products industry, and (5) examine the effectiveness of social media marketing. The study included a questionnaire that was mailed to US forest products manufacturers in late 2013. Results show that close to 58 percent of respondents currently use some form of social media. The most common social media tool implemented was Facebook. Increasing company exposure and branding were cited as the most important reasons for using social media. Security of sensitive information and the cost of implementing a social media marketing strategy were the top concerns about adopting social media. The information collected from this study can be used in assisting the forest products industry in understanding the social media marketing world and developing an effective social media marketing strategy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Marketing and Social Media · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Advice Interactive Group. 2013. Infographic: Internet marketing statistics you can't ignore. http://www.adviceinteractivegroup.com/infographic-internet-marketing-statistics-you-cant-ignore/. Accessed November 2013.
2. Alreck, P. L. 2004. The Survey Research Handbook. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston. 463pp.
3. American Forest and Paper Association. 2012. State industry economic impact—West Virginia. http://www.afandpa.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/west-virginia.pdf. Accessed November 2014.
4. Arano, K. G. 2008. Electronic commerce adoption in West Virginia's primary and secondary hardwood industries: Preliminary results. In:Proceedings of the 2008 Southern Forest Economics Workers (SOFEW) Annual Meeting, March 9–11, 2008, Savannah, Georgia; Southern Forest Economics Workers. pp. 72–81.
5. Batra, R. and M. L. Ray. 1986. Situational effects of advertising repetition: The moderating influence of motivation, ability, and opportunity to respond. J. Consum. Res. 12(4):432–445.
6. Belch, G. E. and M. A. Belch. 2003. Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. The McGraw-Hill Co., Boston. pp. 315–331.
7. Bhagwat, S. and A. Goutam. 2013. Development of social networking sites and their role in business with special reference to Facebook. J. Bus. Manag. 6(5):15–28.
8. Boyd, D. M. and N. B. Ellison. 2008 Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 13:210–230.
9. Broussard, G. 2000. How advertising frequency can work to build online advertising. Int. J. Market Res. 42(4):439–457.
10. Bruno, G., F. Dengler, B. Jennings, R. Khalaf, S. Nurcan, M. Prilla, M. Sarini, R. Schmidt, and R. Silva. 2011. Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software. J. Software Process: Improv. Pract. 23:297–326.
11. Chase, L. and K. Knebl. 2011. The Social Media Sales Revolution: The New Rules for Finding Customers, Building Relationships, and Closing More Sales through Online Networking. McGraw-Hill, New York. pp. 1–22.
12. Dillman, D. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 464pp.
13. Durfee, T. and G. Chen. 2002. E-Commerce: Should we e-?J. Bus. Strategy23(1):14–17.
14. Foux, G. 2006. Get your customers involved. Brand Strategy202:38–39.
15. Grainger, J. 2010. Social media and the fortune 500: How the fortune 500 uses, perceives and measures social media as a marketing tool. (Order No. 1476672, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.) ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. 98pp.
16. Hewitt, R., T. Sowlati, and J. C. Paradi. 2011. Information technology adoption in US and Canadian Forest Products Industries. Forest Prod. J. 61(2):161–169.
17. Holmes, T. P., R. P. Vlosky, and J. Carlson. 2004. An exploratory comparison of internet use by small wood products manufacturers in the North Adirondack Region of New York and the state of Louisiana. Forest Prod. J. 54(12):277–282.
18. Kaplan, A. and M. Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horizons53(1):59–68.
19. Kietzmann, J. H., K. Hermkens, I. P. McCarthy, and B. S. Silvestre. 2011. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus. Horizons54(3):241–251.
20. Koenig, D. 2009. Lumber dealers cautious about social media. Hardwood MattersDecember:8–10.
21. Kotler, P. and G. Armstrong. 2006. Principles of Marketing. Prentice Hall, New York. pp. 463–465.
22. Lin, I. F. and N. C. Schaeffer. 1995. Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation. Public Opinion Q. 2:236–258.
23. Litton, L., J. Nagy, and N. Wortman. 2008. Advertising on social networks drives in-store sales. http://thearf-org-aux-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/annual/pdf/MySpace-comScore-dunhumbyUSA.pdf. Accessed November 2014.
24. Meng, X. 2010. Study on combining of E-commerce and E-marketing. J. Software5(5):546–553.
25. Montague, I. 2011. Social network media in the forest products industry: A look at a new way of marketing. In:Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Hardwood Processing, October 16–18, 2011, Blacksburg, Virginia; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. pp. 235–241.
26. Montague, I. B. and J. Wiedenbeck. 2012. Cultivating connections in 2012—Web strategies used by forest products businesses in the southern U.S. In:Proceedings of the 2012 Southern Forest Economics Workers (SOFEW) Annual Meeting, M. E. Aronow (Ed.), March 19–21, 2012, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southern Forest Economics Workers.pp. 112–124.
27. Palmer, A. and N. Koenig-Lewis. 2009. An experiential, social network-based approach to direct marketing. Direct Mark. Int. J. 3(3):162–176.
28. Pradiptarini, C. 2011. Social media marketing: Measuring its effectiveness and identifying the target market. UW-L J. Undergraduate Res. 65:1–11.
29. Richmond, R. 2007. Enterprise: Facebook, a marketer's friend; site offers platform to tout products, interact with users. Wall Street Journal November:B4.
30. Shook, S. R., Y. Zhang, R. Braden, and J. Baldridg. 2002. Pacific Northwest secondary forest products industry. Forest Prod. J. 52(1):59.
31. Skeels, M. M. and J. Grudin. 2009. When social networks cross boundaries: A case study of workplace use of Facebook and LinkedIn. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, May 10–13, 2009, Sanibel Island, Florida; ACM.pp. 95–104.
32. Trusov, M., R. E. Bucklin, and K. H. Pauwels. 2009. Effects of word of mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site. J. Mark. 73(5):90–102.
33. Vaynerchuk, G. 2011. The Thank You Economy. HarperCollins, New York. 256pp.
34. Vlosky, R. P. 1999. eBusiness in the forest products industry. Forest Prod. J. 49(10):12–21.
35. Vlosky, R. P. and R. Gazo. 1996. The Internet and the forest products community: The role of the Forest Products Society. Forest Prod. J. 46(5):19–25.
36. Vlosky, R. P. and T. M. Smith. 2003. eBusiness in the U.S. hardwood lumber industry. Forest Prod. J. 53(5):21–29.
37. Vlosky, R. P. and T. Westbrook. 2002. eBusiness exchange between homecenter buyers and wood products suppliers. Forest Prod. J. 52(1):38–43.
38. Vlosky, R. P., T. Westbrook, and K. Poku. 2002. An exploratory study of Internet adoption by primary wood products manufacturers in the western United States. Forest Prod. J. 52(6):35–42.
39. Weinberg, B. D. and E. Pehlivan. 2011. Social spending: Managing the social media mix. Bus. Horizons54:275–282.
40. Zielske, H. A. 1959. The remembering and forgetting of advertising. J. Mark. 23(3):239–243.
41. Zwass, V. 1996. Electronic commerce: Structures and issues. Int. J. Electronic Commer. 1(1):3–23.