Grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia versus the conventional dry-pressed and sintered zirconia ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
The grinding and polishing efficiency of self-glazed zirconia and Zenostar zirconia, prepared by wet and dry approaches, respectively, were evaluated. Each sample was divided into two subgroups (n = 5). One was ground, and the other was polished by following the clinical adjustment protocol. Statistics were analysed by independent t-test to a significance level of p < .05. More material was ground off in self-glazed zirconia than in Zenostar zirconia (p < .05) during the same period, especially during the coarse grinding procedure (p < .05), whereas the grinding efficiency in fine grinding stage was not significantly different (p > .05). The polishing efficiency of the whole and of the fine polishing procedure of the two kinds of zirconia was significantly different (p < .05). It thus can be concluded that grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia is significantly higher than that of the conventional Zenostar zirconia.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Funding
Swedish Research Council · Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.00810.1016/j.cden.2003.12.008 ↗
2. 10.1080/17436753.2016.126453710.1080/17436753.2016.1264537 ↗
3. Sailer I · Int J Prosthodont · 2007 · 20 · 383
4. Molin MK · Int J Prosthodont · 2008 · 21 · 223
5. 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.00210.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.002 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60112-110.1016/S0022-3913(11)60112-1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.001 ↗
8. 10.1111/joor.1240910.1111/joor.12409 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00784-016-1872-610.1007/s00784-016-1872-6 ↗
10. 10.1177/0022034598077003060110.1177/00220345980770030601 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.00210.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002 ↗
12. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12385110.1067/mpr.2002.123851 ↗
13. 10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.11110.4047/jap.2010.2.3.111 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.02410.1016/j.dental.2011.11.024 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.03.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.03.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.01010.1016/j.dental.2012.04.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029 ↗
18. 10.1111/jopr.1209410.1111/jopr.12094 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.00810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008 ↗
20. 10.1080/1094034000894571110.1080/10940340008945711 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.010 ↗