journal article·2016-11-16

Measurement of hardness and friction properties of pencil leads for quantification of pencil hardness test

Y. Kim, A. Sung, Y. Seo, S. Hwang, H. Kim

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 115· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

We have investigated the various properties of different types of pencil leads in order to quantify a pencil hardness test for reliability. The chemical composition and mechanical properties for different types of pencils (F, 2H, 4H, 6H and 8H) were measured using X-ray diffraction, nano-indentation and a tribometer. The values for nano-indentation hardness of the pencil leads are in the range of 0.3–0.8 GPa. A higher hardness grade in the pencil lead leads to a wider error range. The clay content of the lead seems to be proportional to the hardness of the pencil lead. Different crystalline phases in clays for each grade of pencil lead result in variations in the degree and distribution of the hardness. Consequently, the content of the crystalline phases in the clay affects deviations in the hardness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.05.00910.1016/j.wear.2012.05.009 ↗
2. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/50/50520110.1088/0957-4484/24/50/505201 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.06.03110.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.06.031 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.07.01910.1016/j.ceramint.2012.07.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.045 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.02.01110.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.02.011 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.05.01210.1016/j.dyepig.2011.05.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.08110.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.081 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.01.01510.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.01.015 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10853-010-4243-810.1007/s10853-010-4243-8 ↗
11. Porwal H. · Adv. Appl. Ceram. · 2015 · 114 · S32
12. 10.1111/1467-8659.0038610.1111/1467-8659.00386 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.01710.1016/j.forsciint.2007.05.017 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.07.013 ↗
15. Lin C.-W. · Sci. Rep · 2014 · 4 · 381210.1038/srep03812 ↗
16. 10.1007/978-0-387-73362-3_210.1007/978-0-387-73362-3_2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.07.09910.1016/j.msea.2007.07.099 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.11.04010.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.11.040 ↗
19. Kim H. S. · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull · 2002 · 81 · 20
20. 10.1179/174367509X1260876392149010.1179/174367509X12608763921490 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0153249010.1007/BF01532490 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00909-610.1016/S0921-5093(00)00909-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0925-9635(00)00188-610.1016/S0925-9635(00)00188-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.03110.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.031 ↗
25. 10.1557/JMR.2004.023310.1557/JMR.2004.0233 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.10.00210.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.10.002 ↗
27. 10.1088/0022-3727/45/29/29530110.1088/0022-3727/45/29/295301 ↗