Combining Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical and Phenol-Resin Impregnation Treatments: Potential for High-Density Poplar Flooring
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) treatments can be used to improve certain properties of underutilized wood species, especially those with low densities. These treatments densify the wood by softening the cell walls using heat, pressure, and moisture but are subject to set-recovery (recovery of compressive deformation) when exposed to humidity. Phenol-based resins have been successful in mitigating this issue when impregnated into the wood. This work explores the use of a new phenol-based resin combined with a THM treatment to limit set-recovery and produce products with the potential for flooring applications. Scratch resistance, hardness, and glue-line shear strength were used to assess the performance. The THM treatment and impregnated phenol resin used in this study increased the scratch resistance, density, and hardness of natural poplar wood and created satisfactory bonding conditions for flooring purposes. With optimization of THM parameters and resin solids content, the resulting product could provide a high-quality flooring material used alone or as a thin laminate from a low-density species like poplar.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Lignin and Wood Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1999. Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-base fiber and particle panel materials. ASTM D1037-99. ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
2. Blanchet, P., R. Ceauregard, A. Erb, and M. Lefebvre. 2003. Comparative study of four adhesives used as binder in engineered wood parquet flooring. Forest Prod. J. 53(1):89–93.
3. Deutsches Institut für Normung. 1979. Testing of wood: Determination of ultimate shearing stress parallel to grain. DIN 52187. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin.
4. Fang, C. H., P. Blanchet, A. Cloutier, and C. Barbuta. 2012. Engineered wood flooring with a densified surface layer for heavy-duty use. BioResources7(4):5843–5854.
5. Forest Products Laboratory. 2010. Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.
6. Franke, T., C. Lenz, N. Herold, and A. Pfriem. 2016. Investigations on phenol/formaldehyde impregnation of beech veneer for improved plasticization and form stability. In: WCTE 2016—World Conference on Timber Engineering,J. Eberhardsteiner, W. Winter, A. Fadai, and M. Pöll (Eds.), August 22–25, 2016, Vienna, Austria; TU Verlag, Vienna.8pp.
7. Gabrielli, C. and F. A. Kamke. 2008. Treatment of chemically modified wood with VTC process to improve dimensional stability. Forest Prod. J. 58(12):82–86.
8. Gabrielli, C. P. and F. A. Kamke. 2010. Phenol-formaldehyde impregnation of densified wood for improved dimensional stability. Wood Sci. Technol. 44(1):95–104.
9. Hill, C. A. S. 2006. Wood Modification: Chemical, Thermal and Other Processes. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
10. International Organization for Standards (ISO). 2018. High-pressure decorative laminates (HPL, DPDL)—Sheets based on thermosetting resins (usually called laminates)—Part 2: Determination of properties. ISO 4586-2. ISO, Geneva.
11. Kantner, W., T. Zich, M. J. Schwarzkopf, M. D. Burnard, M. Mikuljan, and A. Kutnar. 2019. Method for Preparation of Densified Wood Article. Metadynea Austria GmbH, Vienna.
12. Keskin, H., M. Atar, S. Korkut, and A. Tekin. 2010. Scratch resistance of cellulosic, synthetic, polyurethane, waterborne, and acid-hardening varnishes used on woods. Ind. Crops Prod. 31(2):219–224.
13. Kutnar, A. and F. A. Kamke. 2012. Influence of temperature and steam environment on set recovery of compressive deformation of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 46(5):953–964.
14. Kutnar, A., F. A. Kamke, and M. Šernek. 2008. The mechanical properties of densified VTC wood relevant for structural composites. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 66(6):439–446.
15. Kutnar, A., F. A. Kamke, and M. Šernek. 2009. Density profile and morphology of viscoelastic thermal compressed wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 43(1–2):57–68.
16. Kutnar, A. and M. Šernek. 2007. Densification of wood. Zb. gozdarstva Lesar. 82:53–62.
17. Lewis, W. C. 1968. Hardness modulus as an alternative measure of hardness to the standard Janka ball for wood and wood-base materials. Research Note FPL-RN-0189. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin.
18. Meier, E. 2020. Poplar. In:Wood Database. https://www.wood-database.com/poplar. Accessed January 16, 2020.
19. Sandberg, D., A. Kutnar, and G. Mantanis. 2017. Wood modification technologies—A review. iForest10(6):895–908.
20. Schwarzkopf, M., M. Burnard, G. Martínez Pastur, L. Monelos, and A. Kutnar. 2017. Performance of three-layer composites with densified surface layers of Nothofagus pumilio and N. antarctica from Southern Patagonian forests. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 13(5):1–11.
21. Stamm, A. 1959. The dimensional stability of wood. Forest Prod. J. 9(10):375–381.
22. Stamm, A. J. and R. M. Seborg. 1941. Resin-treated, compressed wood. Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 37385–37397.
23. Wang, H., L. Huang, P. Cao, F. Ji, G. Yang, X. Guo, and R. Li. 2017. Investigation of shear strength of engineered wood flooring bonded with PUR by response surface methodology. BioResources12(2):3656–3665.