journal article·2018-01-02

The cutting performance of Al 2 O 3 and Si 3 N 4 ceramic cutting tools in the milling plywood

Xiaolei Guo, Zhaolong Zhu, Mats Ekevad, Xu Bao, Pingxiang Cao

Advances in Applied Ceramics· Volume 117· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

This research focuses on the cutting performance of Al2O3 and Si3N4 ceramic cutting tools in up-milling plywood, the results of which are as follows. First, whether the tool material is Al2O3 or Si3N4 ceramic, the cutting forces at low-speed cutting were less than those at high-speed cutting, and the machining quality at low-speed cutting was greater than that at high-speed cutting. Then, whether at low- or high-speed cutting, the cutting forces of Al2O3 cutting tools were higher than those of Si3N4 cutting tools, and the machining quality of plywood milled by Al2O3 ceramic cutting tools was poorer than that milled by Si3N4 ceramic cutting tools. Finally, Si3N4 ceramic cutting tools were more suitable to machine the wooden productions with much glue content than Al2O3 ceramic cutting tools for the better machined quality.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Materials Engineering and Processing · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Material Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China

Division of Wood Science and Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Skellefteå, Sweden

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) · Power Dekor Group Co. Ltd

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.15376/biores.11.1.1571-158410.15376/biores.11.1.1571-1584 ↗
2. 10.1163/016942410X54995110.1163/016942410X549951 ↗
3. 10.1515/HF.2009.01410.1515/HF.2009.014 ↗
4. 10.15376/biores.9.3.3779-379110.15376/biores.9.3.3779-3791 ↗
5. 10.1051/forest:200208410.1051/forest:2002084 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0263-4368(01)00059-210.1016/S0263-4368(01)00059-2 ↗
7. Darmawan W · J Trop For Sci · 2011 · 23 · 345
8. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.03610.1016/j.wear.2006.03.036 ↗
9. 10.1111/ijac.1214410.1111/ijac.12144 ↗
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.368-372.106210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.368-372.1062 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.764.6510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.764.65 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11249-007-9212-210.1007/s11249-007-9212-2 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02690.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02690.x ↗
14. 10.1007/s00170-013-5206-410.1007/s00170-013-5206-4 ↗
15. Iskra P · Wood Fiber Sci · 2012 · 44 · 134
16. 10.1007/s00170-017-0085-810.1007/s00170-017-0085-8 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00170-014-6016-z10.1007/s00170-014-6016-z ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.00410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.004 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-009-2422-z10.1007/s00170-009-2422-z ↗
20. Zhu ZL · J Forest Eng · 2017 · 2 · 119
21. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.05.00810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.05.008 ↗