journal article·2026-06Open access

Integrated Photocatalytic and Photoelectrocatalytic Degradation of Organic Dyes Over CuV 2 O 6 : Mechanistic Insights and RSM‐Based Optimization

Mohamed El Ouardi, Yassine Elaadssi, Véronique Madigou, Virginie Chevallier, Henrik Haspel, Amal BaQais, Mohamed Saadi, Hassan Ait Ahsaine, Madjid Arab

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 10· Issue 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT A CuV 2 O 6 photocatalyst was successfully synthesized via a hydrothermal route and tested for the degradation of organic dyes under solar light irradiation. Structural and optical characterizations confirmed the formation of a pure crystalline phase with a direct band gap of 2.08 eV, ensuring efficient visible‐light absorption. To maximize the catalytic performance of the pristine CuV 2 O 6 material, operating parameters were systematically optimized using response surface methodology (RSM) combined with a central composite design (CCD). This approach made it possible to reliably estimate linear, quadratic, and interaction effects while reducing the number of experiments required. Under optimized conditions, CuV 2 O 6 efficiently removed dyes, achieving 95% degradation of Rhodamine B and 81% of Methyl Orange within 135–150 min. Radical scavenging tests, as well as the band structure analysis, revealed that superoxide radicals (O 2 • − ) and photogenerated holes (h + ) are the major reactive species implicated in dye decomposition, while TOC and COD measurements have shown significant mineralization. Moreover, incorporating CuV 2 O 6 into a photoelectrocatalytic setup enhanced charge separation and accelerated decomposition, leading to nearly total pollutant elimination within 90 min for RhB and 110 min for MO. In summary, combining RSM optimization with the PEC approach reveals the potential of pure CuV 2 O 6 as an efficient visible light driven wastewater remediation material.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Université De Toulon Aix Marseille Univ CNRS, IM2NP Toulon France

Laboratoire De Chimie Appliquée Des Matériaux Faculté Des Sciences Mohammed V University Rabat Morocco

HUN‐REN‐SZTE Reaction Kinetics and Surface Chemistry Research Group Szeged Hungary

Department of Applied and Environmental Chemistry University of Szeged Szeged Hungary

Department of Chemistry College of Science Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Riyadh Saudi Arabia

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11270‐024‐07702‐410.1007/s11270‐024‐07702‐4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mset.2019.04.00710.1016/j.mset.2019.04.007 ↗
3. 10.7202/1006453ar10.7202/1006453ar ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12420210.1016/j.cej.2020.124202 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.23610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.236 ↗
6. 10.3390/jof703019310.3390/jof7030193 ↗
7. 10.3390/ijerph1724931210.3390/ijerph17249312 ↗
8. 10.1039/D3RA04974D10.1039/D3RA04974D ↗
9. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13431410.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134314 ↗
10. 10.1038/s44296‐025‐00061‐z10.1038/s44296‐025‐00061‐z ↗
11. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11481410.1016/j.molliq.2020.114814 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10853‐025‐10808‐710.1007/s10853‐025‐10808‐7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfin.2019.10038110.1016/j.surfin.2019.100381 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12861610.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128616 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.05510.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.055 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13199210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131992 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cplett.2019.13683210.1016/j.cplett.2019.136832 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.11510.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.115 ↗
19. 10.3329/jsr.v13i2.4961610.3329/jsr.v13i2.49616 ↗
20. 10.3390/catal1509090810.3390/catal15090908 ↗
21. 10.1139/p92‐01110.1139/p92‐011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.envres.2026.12401910.1016/j.envres.2026.124019 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsomega.5c0412610.1021/acsomega.5c04126 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.08910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.089 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0365510.1021/acs.iecr.2c03655 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598‐025‐16568‐310.1038/s41598‐025‐16568‐3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.06.04110.1016/j.dyepig.2006.06.041 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0210810.1021/acsomega.2c02108 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.19630333110.1002/anie.196303331 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.05210.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.052 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.02410.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.024 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0017910.1021/acsaem.9b00179 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.10989210.1016/j.jece.2023.109892 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.05.02310.1016/j.cattod.2014.05.023 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0222710.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02227 ↗
36. 10.1515/pac‐2014‐111710.1515/pac‐2014‐1117 ↗
37. 10.2139/ssrn.490717310.2139/ssrn.4907173 ↗
38. 10.1002/cctc.20120051910.1002/cctc.201200519 ↗
39. 10.1002/jctb.759310.1002/jctb.7593 ↗
40. 10.1002/9781119631422.ch810.1002/9781119631422.ch8 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.03910.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.039 ↗
42. 10.1149/2162‐8777/ad5b8810.1149/2162‐8777/ad5b88 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41598‐017‐08912‐z10.1038/s41598‐017‐08912‐z ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0415510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04155 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.surfin.2025.10665510.1016/j.surfin.2025.106655 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.scenv.2024.10015510.1016/j.scenv.2024.100155 ↗
47. 10.1021/jacsau.4c0052710.1021/jacsau.4c00527 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ssc.2021.11457310.1016/j.ssc.2021.114573 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.01010.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.010 ↗
50. 10.1007/s13201‐015‐0367‐y10.1007/s13201‐015‐0367‐y ↗
51. 10.3390/w1611158810.3390/w16111588 ↗
52. 10.1039/C7RA00199A10.1039/C7RA00199A ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c0052210.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00522 ↗
54. 10.1002/cey2.7022010.1002/cey2.70220 ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20170610810.1002/adma.201706108 ↗
56. 10.1039/D5CY00951K10.1039/D5CY00951K ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c0058210.1021/acs.accounts.4c00582 ↗
58. 10.1007/s12678‐015‐0259‐910.1007/s12678‐015‐0259‐9 ↗
59. 10.3103/S106837552202007710.3103/S1068375522020077 ↗