Clean and Efficient Separation of Aluminum and Sodium From Acid Roasted Slag of Waste Carbon Slag
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Acid‐roasting slag, a by‐product generated during the acid roasting process of solid waste (carbon slag) in aluminum electrolysis, has great potential for value recovery. To recover valuable components, a novel process using carbon powder catalytic calcination was proposed to separate aluminum and sodium. Compared to traditional methods, this process catalyzed by carbon powder significantly reduces temperature (by over 200°C) and energy consumption. Experimental results identified optimal parameters for this process: a slag‐to‐carbon ratio of 0.15:1, calcination temperature of 670°C, duration of 2 h, resulting in a conversion efficiency of NaAl(SO 4 ) 2 of 99.8%. The subsequent water leaching step was optimized at an L/S ratio of 10, room temperature, and 2 h, achieving a leaching efficiency of 99.3% for sodium. Additionally, the resulting Na 2 SO 4 was converted into high‐purity sodium sulfide through carbon thermal reduction at a Na 2 SO 4 to carbon ratio of 0.25:1, 750°C for 2 h, with a Na 2 S recovery rate of 97.3%. Overall, the carbonization catalytic calcination process has proven to be an effective method for the clean and efficient resource utilization of waste residue after carbon slag acidification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bauxite Residue and Utilization · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Extraction and Separation Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Ecological Metallurgy of Polymeta Minerals School of Metallurgy Northeastern University Shenyang China
School of Metallurgy Northeastern University Shenyang Liaoning China
School of Materials Science and Engineering Shenyang Li‐gong University Shenyang China
School of Material Science and Engineering Northeastern University Shenyang Liaoning China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11060410.1016/j.corsci.2022.110604 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10275010.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102750 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.asej.2020.05.01310.1016/j.asej.2020.05.013 ↗
4. 10.1097/JOM.000000000000006210.1097/JOM.0000000000000062 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13245310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132453 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13870710.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138707 ↗
7. 10.1205/09575820053064610.1205/095758200530646 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11663‐020‐01882‐010.1007/s11663‐020‐01882‐0 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10311‐024‐01738‐y10.1007/s10311‐024‐01738‐y ↗
10. 10.1088/1755‐1315/108/4/04202310.1088/1755‐1315/108/4/042023 ↗
11. 10.3390/en1719486610.3390/en17194866 ↗
12. 10.3390/met606012810.3390/met6060128 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.10774010.1016/j.mineng.2022.107740 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11837‐013‐0769‐y10.1007/s11837‐013‐0769‐y ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.10756510.1016/j.mineng.2022.107565 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.gsme.2025.05.00210.1016/j.gsme.2025.05.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.watres.2025.12389510.1016/j.watres.2025.123895 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.13656010.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136560 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12494110.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124941 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12393410.1016/j.seppur.2023.123934 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.14857110.1016/j.cej.2024.148571 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c0183810.1021/acs.iecr.3c01838 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14080010.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140800 ↗
24. 10.1007/s40831‐022‐00543‐710.1007/s40831‐022‐00543‐7 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2024.11027110.1016/j.jfluchem.2024.110271 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11402810.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114028 ↗
27. 10.1007/s40831‐023‐00719‐910.1007/s40831‐023‐00719‐9 ↗
28. 10.1021/i100012a02110.1021/i100012a021 ↗