Sustainable Nanocellulose–Collagen Hybrid Hydrogels From Agro‐Marine Waste with Enhanced Biomechanical Properties for Cartilage Regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Hydrogels are widely used in regenerative medicine due to their biocompatibility and tissue‐like properties; however, many rely on non‐renewable resources and exhibiting limited functionality. This study presents a sustainable hydrogel composite derived from agro‐marine waste, addressing both environmental and biomedical challenges. The composite integrates nanocellulose (NCs) extracted from date fruit pomace with collagen methacryloyl (ColMA) obtained from fish skin. The extracted NCs exhibited an average length of 529 nm, diameter of 63 nm, and crystallinity index of 40.2%. Incorporating 6% NCs into ColMA significantly improved the hydrogel's mechanical strength, increasing the bulk and nano‐elastic moduli to 31 and 24 kPa, respectively. The NC‐ColMA hydrogels displayed excellent shear‐thinning behavior, recovery ability, and UV crosslinking potential, alongside reduced pore size and swelling ratio with enhanced enzymatic and hydrolytic stability. Moreover, the hydrogels supported >95% hMSC viability, promoted proliferation, and upregulated chondrogenic markers (SOX‐9, ACAN, ELN) without elevating pro‐inflammatory cytokines, while modestly increasing TGF‐β1 expression. The composite also demonstrated superior injectability and printability, enabling precise 3D bioprinting. Overall, this NC‐ColMA hydrogel, with its tunable mechanical characteristics and biological compatibility, shows great potential for diverse medical applications while also contributing to waste reduction efforts in the date and fishing industries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Collagen: Extraction and Characterization · Wound Healing and Treatments · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Vijay Lab, Division of Engineering New York University Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi UAE
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Tandon School of Engineering New York University New York USA
Division of Engineering New York University Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi UAE
Department of Biomedical Engineering New York University New York USA
NYU‐KAIST Global Innovation and Research Institute New York USA
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.00610.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 ↗
2. 10.1002/sstr.20250046610.1002/sstr.202500466 ↗
3. 10.1002/sstr.20240049910.1002/sstr.202400499 ↗
4. 10.3389/fpls.2025.166600910.3389/fpls.2025.1666009 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13521310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135213 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.10793010.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107930 ↗
7. 10.1088/1748‐6041/7/2/02410510.1088/1748‐6041/7/2/024105 ↗
8. 10.1002/mabi.20200028010.1002/mabi.202000280 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.08210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.082 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0098510.1021/acs.biomac.2c00985 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11029010.1016/j.msec.2019.110290 ↗
12. Cellulose Lab Inc. Nanocellulose Product Price last modified June 3 2024 https://celluloselab.com/price/Cellulose%20Lab%20Inc%20Product%20Price.htm.
13. FAO and AOAD. 2023. Value chain study Date palm in the Arab region. Cairo FAO https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9917en.10.4060/cb9917en ↗
14. FAOSTAT. Commodities by country last modified May 30 2024 https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/commodities_by_country.
15. Moud A. A. · 2022
16. 10.1007/s10570‐020‐02977‐210.1007/s10570‐020‐02977‐2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.10535310.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105353 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10924‐021‐02089‐310.1007/s10924‐021‐02089‐3 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10016410.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100164 ↗
20. 10.1080/00914037.2019.169520910.1080/00914037.2019.1695209 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.020 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.2c0586410.1021/acsami.2c05864 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20220216310.1002/adhm.202202163 ↗
24. Thomas S. · 2023
25. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.15037610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.150376 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.01.02110.1016/j.bbagen.2018.01.021 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0122710.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01227 ↗
28. 10.1107/S160057671501654410.1107/S1600576715016544 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
30. TAPPI. Standard Terms and Their Definition for Cellulose Nanomaterial WI3021.2011.
31. 10.1038/s41598‐024‐72078‐810.1038/s41598‐024‐72078‐8 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10570‐013‐0019‐z10.1007/s10570‐013‐0019‐z ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10559910.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105599 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.03710.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.037 ↗
35. 10.3390/nano1107179110.3390/nano11071791 ↗
36. 10.3390/ijms23231486310.3390/ijms232314863 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.4866810.1002/app.48668 ↗
38. Mankotia P. · 2024
39. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13521310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135213 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10037410.1016/j.coco.2020.100374 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0034510.1021/acs.biomac.0c00345 ↗
42. 10.1039/c2jm33762b10.1039/c2jm33762b ↗
43. 10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.02210.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022 ↗
44. 10.3390/ma1805099810.3390/ma18050998 ↗
45. 10.1163/156856111x59354010.1163/156856111x593540 ↗
46. 10.1039/c5sm01143d10.1039/c5sm01143d ↗
47. 10.1007/s40204‐020‐00141‐410.1007/s40204‐020‐00141‐4 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11880410.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118804 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.00610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.08.006 ↗
50. 10.1093/micmic/ozad067.32410.1093/micmic/ozad067.324 ↗
51. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.95940910.3389/fbioe.2022.959409 ↗
52. 10.3390/polym1212281810.3390/polym12122818 ↗
53. 10.1007/s42114‐024‐01196‐810.1007/s42114‐024‐01196‐8 ↗
54. 10.1186/s12951‐025‐03097‐410.1186/s12951‐025‐03097‐4 ↗
55. 10.1186/s13287‐019‐1447‐y10.1186/s13287‐019‐1447‐y ↗
56. 10.1016/bs.ai.2017.01.00110.1016/bs.ai.2017.01.001 ↗
57. 10.1002/adma.20200377810.1002/adma.202003778 ↗
58. 10.2217/rme‐2022‐022210.2217/rme‐2022‐0222 ↗
59. 10.3390/polym1411230010.3390/polym14112300 ↗