journal article·2026-02Open access

Life Cycle Assessment of Graphite, Silicon Composite, and Silicon‐Dominant Anodes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Environmental Impacts, Uncertainties, and Supply Chain Considerations

Elisa Ravesio, Valentina Sumini, Laura Genovese, Daniele Versaci, Silvia Bodoardo

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 10· Issue 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) are essential for applications from portable devices to electric vehicles, where higher specific energy and energy density drive innovation. As cathode research moves toward cobalt‐free formulations, anode development focuses on incorporating silicon into graphite. Although silicon production is more energy‐intensive than synthetic graphite, its superior theoretical capacity (4200 vs. 372 mAh g −1 ) reduces the material demand for equivalent electrochemical performance. This study assessed the environmental impacts of producing and testing three anode types, graphite (benchmark, ∼350 mAh g −1 ), silicon composite (10% Si, ∼400 mAh g −1 ), and silicon‐dominant (80% Si, capacity limited at ∼1000 mAh g −1 ) using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) at laboratory scale. Results indicated that introducing silicon leads to lower impacts under the investigated conditions across most of the 18 midpoint categories of ReCiPe 2016 (H). Regarding the carbon footprint, CO 2 emissions decreased by about 40% (from 1.33 to 0.79 kg CO 2 ‐Eq) for the silicon composite and up to 97% (0.04 kg CO 2 ‐Eq) for the silicon‐dominant electrode. Sensitivity analysis highlighted the importance of supply‐chain conditions: adopting a European electricity mix and shorter transport distances led to additional reductions even at gram‐scale production. Overall, integrating silicon and optimizing regional supply chains promoted more sustainable LIB production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Advancements in Battery Materials · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Science and Technology (DISAT) Politecnico Di Torino Turin Italy

Coesia Engineering Center Coesia Bologna Italy

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. “Europe Now Has 30 EV Battery Gigafactories in Operation ” accessed September 15 2025 https://electricdrives.tv/europe‐now‐has‐30‐ev‐battery‐gigafactories‐in‐operation/.
2. 10.1016/j.procir.2024.12.07610.1016/j.procir.2024.12.076 ↗
3. 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.105410.3934/matersci.2016.3.1054 ↗
4. 10.1007/S40820‐022‐00844‐210.1007/S40820‐022‐00844‐2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.seta.2025.10448810.1016/j.seta.2025.104488 ↗
6. Wang F. · 489
7. 10.1007/s11356‐025‐36270‐110.1007/s11356‐025‐36270‐1 ↗
8. Li B. · 2013
9. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10663510.1016/j.est.2023.106635 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10098‐018‐1548‐910.1007/s10098‐018‐1548‐9 ↗
11. 10.1021/es403778610.1021/es4037786 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e0160910.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01609 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0413610.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04136 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10243710.1016/j.isci.2021.102437 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.23670310.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236703 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13551010.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135510 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.01910.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 ↗
18. Boon‐Brett L. · 2017 · 1
19. “Research & Innovation Roadmap 2023 – Batteries Europe ” accessed October 28 2025 https://batterieseurope.eu/results/technology‐roadmap/researchandinnovationroadmap‐2023/.
20. 10.1149/1945‐7111/ac862810.1149/1945‐7111/ac8628 ↗
21. 10.1002/batt.20250050010.1002/batt.202500500 ↗
22. 10.1007/s13204‐022‐02550‐210.1007/s13204‐022‐02550‐2 ↗
23. 10.1111/jiec.1207210.1111/jiec.12072 ↗
24. 10.3390/batteries501002310.3390/batteries5010023 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.rser.2024.11486010.1016/j.rser.2024.114860 ↗
26. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4C0559110.1021/acssuschemeng.4C05591 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11367‐012‐0511‐y10.1007/s11367‐012‐0511‐y ↗
28. 10.3390/batteries701001410.3390/batteries7010014 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.est.2025.11696510.1016/j.est.2025.116965 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10997110.1016/j.matdes.2021.109971 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11367‐016‐1246‐y10.1007/s11367‐016‐1246‐y ↗
32. “Global Battery Supply Chain: Hidden Regional Trends | McKinsey ” accessed September 5 2025 https://www.mckinsey.com/features/mckinsey‐center‐for‐future‐mobility/our‐insights/the‐hidden‐trends‐in‐battery‐supply‐and‐demand‐a‐regional‐analysis.
33. “Critical Raw Materials Act—European Commission ” accessed September 2 2025 https://single‐market‐economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw‐materials/areas‐specific‐interest/critical‐raw‐materials/critical‐raw‐materials‐act_en#actions‐under‐the‐critical‐raw‐materials‐act.
34. 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e0061410.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00614 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.02310.1016/j.procir.2023.02.023 ↗
36. “Database—Transport—Eurostat ” accessed September 2 2025 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/transport/database.
37. 10.20517/gmo.2024.09220110.20517/gmo.2024.092201 ↗
38. 10.1088/2515‐7620/ab5e1e10.1088/2515‐7620/ab5e1e ↗
39. 10.1007/s11367‐022‐02023‐210.1007/s11367‐022‐02023‐2 ↗
40. “E‐magy ‐ The Battery Industry Is On with Silicon ” accessed September 6 2025 https://e‐magy.com/.
41. “Global Energy Review 2025 – Analysis—IEA ” accessed October 28 2025 https://www.iea.org/reports/global‐energy‐review‐2025.
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.14032610.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140326 ↗