journal article·2026-01Open access

Spent Graphite—HARD Carbon Composite Anode for Sustainable and High‐Performance Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Dona Susan Baji, Shantikumar Nair, Dhamodaran Santhanagopalan

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Graphite is considered as the benchmark anode for lithium‐ion batteries (LIB) due to its good performance metrics. However, graphite has limitations for high‐power conditions due to safety concerns. Hard carbon (HC) represents a structurally disordered carbonaceous material that has a better rate capability and better temperature stability than graphite. This study introduces a sustainable composite anode material of regenerated spent graphite (SG) and hard carbon, distinguishing it from previously reported materials. Herein, we have systematically studied the performance of HC, the regenerated SG, and its composites HC:SG‐3:1, HC:SG‐1:1 and HC:SG‐1:3. The specific capacity of HC was 198 mAh/g compared to 301 mAh/g of SG at a rate of C/2; when these electrodes were tested at a rate of 5C, HC delivered 113 mAh/g while the SG delivered only 40 mAh/g. Also, cycling of HC, HC:SG‐3:1, HC:SG‐1:1, and SG delivered a capacity of 125, 109, 104, and 76 mAh/g respectively, at the end of the 500 th cycle at a 5C rate. The full‐cell performance of the HC:SG composite showed satisfactory performance with an energy density of 260 Wh/kg a . Further, ex situ surface chemical analysis was carried out in pristine and cycled electrodes to understand the chemical changes upon cycling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Extraction and Separation Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Nanosciences and Molecular Medicine Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Kochi India

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10803310.1016/j.est.2023.108033 ↗
2. 10.1039/C9CS00162J10.1039/C9CS00162J ↗
3. 10.1039/D0SE00175A10.1039/D0SE00175A ↗
4. 10.1002/smll.20240261610.1002/smll.202402616 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20250619010.1002/adfm.202506190 ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20190760210.1002/smll.201907602 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.02810.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.028 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0378‐7753(01)00619‐X10.1016/S0378‐7753(01)00619‐X ↗
9. 10.1002/adsu.20240031610.1002/adsu.202400316 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20120968910.1002/anie.201209689 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20210165010.1002/aenm.202101650 ↗
12. 10.3389/fchem.2020.60750410.3389/fchem.2020.607504 ↗
13. 10.1039/D0CS00187B10.1039/D0CS00187B ↗
14. 10.1039/D4SC00734D10.1039/D4SC00734D ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10338610.1016/j.ensm.2024.103386 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.10185110.1016/j.xcrp.2024.101851 ↗
17. 10.1149/MA2020‐023539mtgabs10.1149/MA2020‐023539mtgabs ↗
18. 10.1149/2.0451908jes10.1149/2.0451908jes ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐61481‐y10.1038/s41467‐025‐61481‐y ↗
20. 10.1021/acssusresmgt.5c0040810.1021/acssusresmgt.5c00408 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.05.26410.1016/j.egyr.2023.05.264 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10684110.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106841 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20240410610.1002/smll.202404106 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.12.02410.1016/j.jiec.2023.12.024 ↗
25. S.Natarajan M. L.Divya andV.Aravindan “Should we Recycle the Graphite from Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries? The Untold Story of Graphite With the Importance of Recycling ”Journal of Energy Chemistry71(2022):351–369 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.012.The untold story of graphite with the importance of recycling.10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.est.2024.11219310.1016/j.est.2024.112193 ↗
27. 10.1039/C8RA07170E10.1039/C8RA07170E ↗
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.05410.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.054 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.09510.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.095 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.047 ↗
31. 10.3390/batteries809010810.3390/batteries8090108 ↗
32. 10.1002/bte2.2022005410.1002/bte2.20220054 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11356‐023‐29354‐310.1007/s11356‐023‐29354‐3 ↗
34. 10.1007/s42452‐020‐03241‐910.1007/s42452‐020‐03241‐9 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.gee.2021.01.02110.1016/j.gee.2021.01.021 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.10062210.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100622 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.16374910.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163749 ↗
38. 10.1149/2.1151814jes10.1149/2.1151814jes ↗
39. 10.1080/1536383X.2020.179485110.1080/1536383X.2020.1794851 ↗
40. 10.1149/2.0121903jes10.1149/2.0121903jes ↗
41. 10.1002/batt.20250057510.1002/batt.202500575 ↗
42. 10.1002/ente.20190027310.1002/ente.201900273 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11581‐020‐03814‐z10.1007/s11581‐020‐03814‐z ↗
44. 10.1002/adfm.20230062910.1002/adfm.202300629 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0309610.1021/acsaem.1c03096 ↗
46. 10.1002/aenm.20230009610.1002/aenm.202300096 ↗
47. 10.1149/1945‐7111/ab78fc10.1149/1945‐7111/ab78fc ↗
48. 10.1002/anie.20201399310.1002/anie.202013993 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2024.10185110.1016/j.xcrp.2024.101851 ↗
50. 10.1007/s40820‐021‐00758‐510.1007/s40820‐021‐00758‐5 ↗
51. 10.1371/journal.pone.031194310.1371/journal.pone.0311943 ↗