journal article·2016-07-01

Sustainability of Sustainable Fashion Products and Impact of Brand Names and Cause-Related Marketing on Purchase Intention

Sookhyun Kim

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 3· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure the equity of sustainability of sustainable fashion product types, to examine consumers’ purchase intentions, and to study the effect of brand names and cause-related marketing on the product types. The differences among benefit-sought segments on the above variables were also tested. The results show that the highest equity of sustainability did not generate the highest purchase intention. Cause-related marketing significantly influenced the purchase intention on some selected product types regardless of brand names. Benefit-sought groups showed significantly different equities of sustainability, purchase intention, and effects of brand names and cause-related marketing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Environmental Sustainability in Business · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Digital Marketing and Social Media

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

California State University, Long Beach and Hyunshin Na, Seoul Women's University

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Fechner Day, Townsend J.T. In Okala Ecological Design; Ecodesign Section of the Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA) with Eastman Chemical Co. Whirlpool Corp., and the US Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), 2004.
2. Yip D. What Does Sustainable Fashion Mean to You? BC Living 2010, http://www.bcliving.ca/style/what-does-sustainable-fashion-mean-to-you (accessed July 21, 2013).
3. Green Advisory Board. Designer Eco Criteria. Eco Fashion Week 2010, http://www.insidevancouver.ca/2011/02/23/eco-fashion-week/
4. Aveda, Eco Fashion World [Online] 2011, http://ecofashionworld.com/Browse-By-Eco-Criteria.html (accessed July 21, 2013).
5. Shen D. · The Marketing Management Journal · 2013 · 23 · 134
6. 10.1108/1361202121122282410.1108/13612021211222824 ↗
7. Bonini S, Oppenheim J. Cultivating the Green Consumer, Stanford Social Innovation Review [Online] 2008, http://ssir.org/articles/entry/cultivating_the_green_consumer (accessed July 21, 2013).
8. 10.1177/0013916992197198510.1177/00139169921971985 ↗
9. 10.1177/0887302X970150020210.1177/0887302X9701500202 ↗
10. 10.1108/0736376011041026310.1108/07363760110410263 ↗
11. 10.1177/0887302X970150010310.1177/0887302X9701500103 ↗
12. 10.1108/1361202061067932110.1108/13612020610679321 ↗
13. 10.1177/0887302X980160030310.1177/0887302X9801600303 ↗
14. Mintel O. · 2009
15. 10.1002/sd.45510.1002/sd.455 ↗
16. Ochoa L. M. C. Will “Eco-Fashion” Take Off? A Survey of Potential Customers of Organic Cotton Clothes in London 2011, http://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/administer/article/view/188 (accessed October 10, 2011).
17. 10.3917/g2000.303.007710.3917/g2000.303.0077 ↗
18. 10.2752/175174108X34693110.2752/175174108X346931 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00280-910.1016/S0148-2963(96)00280-9 ↗
20. 10.1108/0736376101103835610.1108/07363761011038356 ↗
21. 10.1177/00222437880250020610.1177/002224378802500206 ↗
22. Lee J. · 2010
23. 10.1080/00913367.2012.1067245410.1080/00913367.2012.10672454 ↗
24. Hough H. · MediaWeek · 2007 · 17 · 14
25. 10.2753/JOA0091-336741040310.2753/JOA0091-3367410403 ↗
26. 10.1177/0887302X020200040410.1177/0887302X0202000404 ↗
27. Choi I · Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles · 1995 · 19 · 651
28. 10.1177/0887302X000180020510.1177/0887302X0001800205 ↗
29. 10.1080/00405000700146235110.1080/004050007001462351 ↗
30. 10.1177/0887302X870060010410.1177/0887302X8700600104 ↗