Realization of Aqueous Processed LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 through the pH Optimization of Polyacrylate Binders
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The transition to aqueous cathode processing is essential for achieving sustainable lithium‐ion battery production. Replacing the widely used solvent, N ‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone (NMP), with water poses challenges, particularly due to rapid pH increases during processing. This leads to aluminum corrosion and reduced performance. This study investigates the stability and performance of spinel LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO) electrodes processed with water‐based polyacrylate binders across a pH range. By partly neutralization with sodium or lithium, respectively, the pH is tuned from 5 to 8. The binders are assessed for their ability to stabilize slurry pH during processing and their electrochemical performance. Full cell cycling identifies pH5 as optimal condition for achieving on‐par performance and excellent cycling stability. Compared, electrodes processed at higher pH exhibit significantly reduced electrochemical performance. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy reveals that higher slurry pH correlates with increased charge transfer resistance, while surface analyses using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy indicate increased conductive carbon and binder agglomeration at higher pH, leading to an inhomogeneous electrode. Operando X‐ray diffraction confirms that poor conductive carbon/binder distribution in the cathodes processed at higher pH prevents complete (de)lithiation, while electrodes processed at pH5 demonstrate a uniform conductive network, resulting in superior performance comparable to conventionally processed counterparts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Sustainable Energy Technology SINTEF Industry Trondheim 7491 Norway
Department of Chemical Engineering Münster University of Applied Sciences 48565 Steinfurt Germany
Centre for Materials Science and Nanotechnology Department of Chemistry University of Oslo Oslo 0315 Norway
Department of Materials Science and Engineering NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim 7491 Norway
Funding
Norges Forskningsråd
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.074 ↗
2. 10.1039/D0TA02812F10.1039/D0TA02812F ↗
3. 10.1039/D3TA01777J10.1039/D3TA01777J ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0155310.1021/acsenergylett.2c01553 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.1c1955410.1021/acsami.1c19554 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20200250810.1002/aenm.202002508 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20230516110.1002/adfm.202305161 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8EE00640G10.1039/C8EE00640G ↗
9. 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00784-310.1016/S0013-4686(02)00784-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.02210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.022 ↗
11. 10.1002/smtd.20200003910.1002/smtd.202000039 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.01910.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.019 ↗
13. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab856b10.1149/1945-7111/ab856b ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.14956410.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149564 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13113010.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131130 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0205110.1021/acsaem.0c02051 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0281701jes10.1149/2.0281701jes ↗
18. F. DeGiorgio C.Arbizzani M.Mastragostino N.Laszczynski S.Passerini ECS Meeting Abstracts Vol.MA2016‐03 IOP Science Bristol UK2016 p.919 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/MA2016-03/2/919.10.1149/MA2016-03/2/919 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.06410.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.064 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.03910.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.039 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.020 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.14410.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.144 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.14110.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.141 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-006-1172-710.1007/s10853-006-1172-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.08010.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.09.080 ↗
27. 10.1002/cssc.20160035310.1002/cssc.201600353 ↗
28. 10.1002/batt.20240045710.1002/batt.202400457 ↗
29. 10.1039/D4TA08301F10.1039/D4TA08301F ↗
30. 10.1002/aesr.20210007510.1002/aesr.202100075 ↗
31. 10.1002/cssc.20170202110.1002/cssc.201702021 ↗
32. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad242b10.1149/1945-7111/ad242b ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.1c0668310.1021/acsami.1c06683 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.06810.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.068 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20150100810.1002/aenm.201501008 ↗
36. 10.1002/cplu.20240019510.1002/cplu.202400195 ↗
37. 10.5006/0010-9312-14.11.1610.5006/0010-9312-14.11.16 ↗
38. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0026810.3389/fchem.2019.00268 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.000022310.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000223 ↗
40. 10.1002/cssc.20220040110.1002/cssc.202200401 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00216-510.1016/S0378-7753(99)00216-5 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.02010.1016/j.ensm.2019.08.020 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22831510.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228315 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.4c0189110.1021/acsami.4c01891 ↗
45. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b0069010.1021/acscentsci.8b00690 ↗
46. 10.1149/1945-7111/ad8d5110.1149/1945-7111/ad8d51 ↗
47. 10.1149/2.0131709jes10.1149/2.0131709jes ↗
48. 10.1149/2.0861707jes10.1149/2.0861707jes ↗
49. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc03310.1149/1945-7111/abc033 ↗
50. 10.1149/2.0921714jes10.1149/2.0921714jes ↗
51. 10.1149/2.0401802jes10.1149/2.0401802jes ↗
52. 10.1039/D3SU00031A10.1039/D3SU00031A ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23448710.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234487 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00250-710.1016/S0378-7753(03)00250-7 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.est.2020.10134410.1016/j.est.2020.101344 ↗
56. 10.1107/S160057751701748910.1107/S1600577517017489 ↗