journal article·2024-07Open access

Interrogation of Ecotoxic Elements Distribution in Slag and Precipitated Calcite through a Machine Learning‐Based Approach Aided by Mass Spectrometry

Faisal W. K. Khudhur, Matthew Divers, Mark Wildman, John M. MacDonald, Joshua Franz Einsle

Advanced Sustainable Systems· Volume 8· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract CO2 mineralization in slag has been widely investigated as a potential solution for offsetting steelmaking industry emissions. However, it can be associated with ecotoxic elements release (e.g., V and Cr). The presence of such elements in heterogenous slag at the micro‐scale remains difficult for analysis since microstructural features can be missed during microscopy data inspection, thereby presenting a challenge in understanding how ecotoxic elements exist in slag. Here, an unsupervised machine learning‐based technique is used to analyze slag's microstructural features. Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) data are analyzed through Hierarchical Density‐Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) method. Results show that passive CO2 mineralization has occurred in situ in the studied samples, on the surface, and within their pores. Additionally, V and Cr regions with equivalent diameters < 42 µm can exist within slag, potentially making such elements prone to mobilization due to slag pulverization. Interrogation of the samples with Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (LA‐ICP‐MS) confirms the distribution of the elements obtained from the clustering algorithm and further demonstrates that up to 84 and 9 ppm of V and Cr are incorporated in the precipitated calcite, respectively. This implies that ecotoxic elements may be immobilized through calcite precipitation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Geological and Geochemical Analysis · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Geographical and Earth Sciences University of Glasgow Glasgow G12 8QQ UK

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Strathclyde Glasgow G1 1XJ UK

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. World Steel Association “World Steel in Figures ” can be found underhttps://worldsteel.org/steel‐topics/statistics/world‐steel‐in‐figures‐2022/ 2023.
2. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.04410.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.044 ↗
3. World Steel Association “World Steel in Figures 2019 ” can be found underhttps://worldsteel.org/wp‐content/uploads/2019‐World‐Steel‐in‐Figures.pdf 2019.
4. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15028010.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150280 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15355310.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153553 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0188310.1021/acs.est.8b01883 ↗
7. 10.1021/ie202693q10.1021/ie202693q ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.04210.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.042 ↗
9. 10.1016/0360-5442(95)00071-N10.1016/0360-5442(95)00071-N ↗
10. 10.1021/es052334010.1021/es0523340 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0126510.1021/acs.est.9b01265 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.11110.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.111 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11270-008-9725-910.1007/s11270-008-9725-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.00910.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.00810.1016/j.ijggc.2018.02.008 ↗
16. 10.1021/es052534b10.1021/es052534b ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0087410.1021/acs.est.7b00874 ↗
18. 10.1155/2011/46363810.1155/2011/463638 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.12.00410.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.12.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.02110.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.021 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.11331410.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113314 ↗
22. Love J. · 1989
23. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100117-2.00010-810.1016/B978-0-08-100117-2.00010-8 ↗
24. Wolfgong W. J. · 2016 · 279
25. Goldstein J. I. · 2017
26. S.Burgess “Determining accurate detection limits for EDS analysis using simulated spectra – Oxford Instruments ” can be found underhttps://www.oxinst.com/blogs/determining‐accurate‐detection‐limits‐for‐eds‐analysis‐using‐simulated‐spectra 2022.
27. J.Shlens Arxiv2014 https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.1100v1
28. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.11233610.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112336 ↗
29. 10.1002/sia.165710.1002/sia.1657 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.gexplo.2020.10663010.1016/j.gexplo.2020.106630 ↗
31. 10.1017/S143192762200091510.1017/S1431927622000915 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.10564910.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105649 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.000041110.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000411 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.08.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.08.002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.10723210.1016/j.mineng.2021.107232 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.micron.2023.10353210.1016/j.micron.2023.103532 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.00410.1016/j.mineng.2012.10.004 ↗
38. 10.2138/rmg.2013.77.910.2138/rmg.2013.77.9 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.01410.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.014 ↗
40. 10.1029/2020GL08847210.1029/2020GL088472 ↗
41. 10.1007/s11663-013-9894-910.1007/s11663-013-9894-9 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11663-007-9112-810.1007/s11663-007-9112-8 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10853-013-7225-910.1007/s10853-013-7225-9 ↗
44. C.Crouzet F.Brunet G.Montes‐Hernandez N.Recham N.Findling J. H.Ferrasse B.Goffé Front. Energy Res.2017 5 2017.00029.10.3389/feart.2017.00086 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.01510.1016/j.cej.2016.04.015 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.10732210.1016/j.mineng.2021.107322 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00125-210.1016/S0016-7037(98)00125-2 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.01810.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.018 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.02.00110.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.02.001 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.15510.1016/j.cej.2012.06.155 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
52. F.de laPeña E.Prestat V. T.Fauske P.Burdet J.Lähnemann P.Jokubauskas T.Furnival M.Nord T.Ostasevicius K. E.MacArthur D. N.Johnstone M.Sarahan J.Taillon T.Aarholt pquinn‐dls V.Migunov A.Eljarrat J.Caron C.Francis T.Nemoto T.Poon S.Mazzucco actions‐user N.Tappy N.Cautaerts S.Somnath T.Slater M.Walls F.Winkler H. W.Ånes Zenodo2022 https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7263263.
53. The pandas development team Zenodo2023 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8364959.
54. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.5510.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
55. 10.21105/joss.0302110.21105/joss.03021 ↗
56. 10.7717/peerj.45310.7717/peerj.453 ↗
57. Landers T. · Encycl. Database Syst. · 2009 · 6 · 846
58. 10.1017/S143192762101369610.1017/S1431927621013696 ↗
59. Aggarwal C. C. · 2001 · 420
60. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
61. Campello R. J. G. B. · 2013 · 160
62. 10.21105/joss.0020510.21105/joss.00205 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.minpro.2006.07.01810.1016/j.minpro.2006.07.018 ↗
64. 10.1007/s11837-000-0126-910.1007/s11837-000-0126-9 ↗
65. 10.3190/jgeosci.25010.3190/jgeosci.250 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.cageo.2022.10510910.1016/j.cageo.2022.105109 ↗
67. Lafuente B. · 2015 · 1
68. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.00410.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.03.004 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.16310.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.163 ↗
70. 10.1039/D0JA00259C10.1039/D0JA00259C ↗
71. 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2005.tb00904.x10.1111/j.1751-908X.2005.tb00904.x ↗
72. 10.5281/zenodo.838912210.5281/zenodo.8389122 ↗