How to Consider the Interfacial Phenomenon in All‐Solid‐State Batteries? – Quantitative Analysis using µ‐Cavity Electrode
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the intrinsic properties of cathode active particles is required to understand how they depend on the charge transfer resistance at solid–liquid or solid‐solid interfaces. Depth‐of‐discharge (DOD)‐dependent charge transport occurs when lithium ions move from the bulk electrolyte to the cathode active particles. However, composite electrodes consist of unevenly distributed active material, conductive additives, and polymeric binder, which complicates the electron/ion conduction path; hence, estimating the DOD‐dependent charge transfer resistance is difficult. However, micro‐sized spherical cathode active particles can be arranged into a cylindrical cavity trap on a microelectrode to evaluate the interfacial behavior of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) cathode active particles in liquid and solid electrolyte systems. The electrochemical parameters calculated from the resultant Tafel plot can encourage meaningful discussions and demonstrate the reliability of the measurement technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Energy Science and Technology Chungnam National University 99 Daehak‐ro, Yuseong‐gu Daejeon 34134 Republic of Korea
Advanced Batteries Research Center Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI) 25 Saenari‐ro, Bundang‐gu Seongnam 13509 Republic of Korea
Department of Applied Chemistry Graduate School of Urban Environmental Science Tokyo Metropolitan University 1‐1 Minami‐ohsawa Hachioji Tokyo 1920397 Japan
Funding
Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0016-7037(86)90346-710.1016/0016-7037(86)90346-7 ↗
2. 10.1081/SS-20004224410.1081/SS-200042244 ↗
3. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.4310.1038/nenergy.2016.43 ↗
4. 10.1021/cm901452z10.1021/cm901452z ↗
5. 10.1039/C8EE00001H10.1039/C8EE00001H ↗
6. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0061210.1021/acsaem.8b00612 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41578-019-0157-510.1038/s41578-019-0157-5 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.135919710.1149/1.1359197 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.1c2168310.1021/acsami.1c21683 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1388-2481(03)00113-910.1016/S1388-2481(03)00113-9 ↗
11. Bard A. J. · 2000
12. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.03710.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.037 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp912089q10.1021/jp912089q ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.08110.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.07.081 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.06.04210.1016/j.jelechem.2017.06.042 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13516010.1016/j.electacta.2019.135160 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.05.01310.1016/j.jechem.2019.05.013 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tca.2021.17906910.1016/j.tca.2021.179069 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.8b0513210.1021/acsami.8b05132 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.00910.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.009 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.047 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13881310.1016/j.electacta.2021.138813 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.01810.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.018 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.coelec.2019.06.00310.1016/j.coelec.2019.06.003 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20200325010.1002/aenm.202003250 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.11351410.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113514 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20200393910.1002/aenm.202003939 ↗
28. 10.1149/2.0821915jes10.1149/2.0821915jes ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0383410.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03834 ↗
30. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9a2c10.1149/1945-7111/ab9a2c ↗
31. 10.1039/C8EE00001H10.1039/C8EE00001H ↗
32. 10.1038/s41560-020-0647-010.1038/s41560-020-0647-0 ↗